Fernando Jaramillo

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · 2004–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 23 papers; trusts 87 researchers and is trusted by 35 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Fernando Jaramillo trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Jay P. Mulki
  2. Charles H. Schwepker
  3. George R. Franke
  4. Mark G. Ehrhart
  5. Philip M. Podsakoff
  6. S. Bhuian
  7. Jeong-eun Park
  8. Scott B. MacKenzie
  9. L. Chonko
  10. Guangping Wang

Who trusts Fernando Jaramillo overall

  1. Jay P. Mulki
  2. James Deconinck
  3. Charles H. Schwepker
  4. B. Bande
  5. Raj Agnihotri
  6. Alexander Newman
  7. E. A. Goad
  8. Douglas B. Grisaffe
  9. Ugur Yavas
  10. D. Parris

Papers from Fernando Jaramillo's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Fernando Jaramillo trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  2. Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research
  3. Leadership and Procedural Justice Climate as Antecedents of Unit-Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior.
  4. LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS
  5. Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  6. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  7. AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE, AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF ANTECEDENTS, CORRELATES, AND CONSEQUENCES
  8. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.
  9. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
  10. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. (Journal of Applied Psychology)

Their papers