On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure.
By J. Colquitt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001
5,718 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1ad2a08dc6b9c598f2ac101b22c2de8cd23e47f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- M. Kaptein
- David M. Mayer
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Rebecca L. Greenbaum
- Russell S. Cropanzano
- Mary B. Mawritz
- Maribeth Kuenzi
- Dongkyu Kim
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Fred Walumbwa
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Sharon K. Parker
- Osman M. Karatepe
- Adam M. Grant
In Strategy and Management
- Fred Walumbwa
- D. van Knippenberg
- David de Cremer
- David M. Mayer
- Russell S. Cropanzano
- Christian Vandenberghe
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Dirk van Dierendonck
Citations in the corpus
- (Un)Ethical Behavior and Performance Appraisal: The Role of Affect, Support, and Organizational Justice (2013, background): “forms of work behavior (see Cropanzano and Stein 2009). For instance, in their meta-analysis on citizenship, Organ and Ryan (1995) found that fairness (distributive, procedural, and overall) was significantly positively linked to citizenship.”
- Creating an ethical organizational environment: The relationship between ethical leadership, ethical organizational climate, and unethical behavior (2020, background): “Just as Colquitt (2001) provides a refined measure of justice, researchers still rely on prior, seminal work to build their research arguments.”
- The Effects of Performance Rating, Leader–Member Exchange, Perceived Utility, and Organizational Justice on Performance Appraisal Satisfaction: Applying a Moral Judgment Perspective (2014, background): “interpersonal justice, stressing issues of politeness, and respect (Colquitt 2001; Greenberg 1993).”
- Relationship Clean-Up Time: Using Meta-Analysis and Path Analysis to Clarify Relationships Among Job Satisfaction, Perceived Fairness, and Citizenship Behaviors † (2008, background): “, an informational component) and treating people with dignity and respect (i.e., an interpersonal component; Colquitt, 2001; Greenberg, 1993).”
- Perceptions of the organizational context and psychological contract breach: Assessing competing perspectives (2009, methodology): “Perceptions of procedural justice were assessed using Colquitt’s (2001) 6-item scale (a = .”
- The Moderating Effects of Equity Sensitivity on The Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (2005, background): “Research has recognized several components of organizational justice—distributive, procedural, interactional, and informational (e.g., Colquitt, 2001; Cropanzano & Greenberg, 1997; Moorman, 1991; Parker, Baltes, & Christiansen, 1997; Tyler & Lind, 1992).”
- The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. (2005, methodology): “Therefore, contrary to how it has been modeled in the literature (cf. Colquitt, 2001; Masterson, 2001; Moorman, 1991), procedural justice should probably be modeled as having formative indicators.”
- Ethical leadership, trust in leader and creativity: The mediated mechanism and an interacting effect (2018, background): “Organizational justice theory, developed by Greenberg (1987) and modified by Colquitt (2001), may address the second component of the ethical leader’s characteristics (i.e., believing in justice).”
- The development and validation of the Workplace Ostracism Scale. (2008, background): “, 1982) X Group cohesion (Seashore, 1954) X Interpersonal justice (Colquitt, 2001) X Perceived coworker OCB norms X”
- Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement (2018, background): “, interactional justice experienced today; Judge, Scott, & Ilies, 2006) rather than a comprehensive array of experiences that might be captured by broadly worded items from traditional survey measures (e.g., numerous forms of justice experience in general; Colquitt, 2001).”
- An Approach‐Inhibition Model of Employee Silence: The Joint Effects of Personal Sense of Power and Target Openness (2015, methodology): “The closest is research on how offering recommendations and ideas for change relates to perceptions of autonomy and personal control (Tangirala & Ramanujam, 2008b). For example, Tangirala and Ramanujam (2008b) found a curvilinear relationship between voice and employees’ perceptions of control over ”
- Leadership Processes and Follower Self-identity (2003, methodology): “Distributive justice focuses on whether outcomes are consistent with norms for outcome allocation (e.g., equity or equality; Colquitt, 2001), whereas procedural justice pertains to the fairness of the methods used to produce outcome distribution decisions.”
- Transformational Leadership, Interactional Justice, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (2014, background): “(2007) supported a partial mediation model showing that interactional justice components (interpersonal, informational justice; Colquitt, 2001) mediated relations between transformational leadership and attitudes about organizational change.”
- Organizational Commitment in the Military: Application of a Profile Approach (2013, methodology): “Four components of organizational justice were measured using scales developed by Colquitt (2001).”