Servant leadership and ethics: a dyadic examination of supervisor behaviors and salesperson perceptions
By Fernando Jaramillo, B. Bande, J. Varela. 2015
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbc47dc776a87fa577aa11c166711887cff46a68
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
- Dirk van Dierendonck
- Madelyn Geldenhuys
- Michiel Frederick Coetzer
- M. Bussin
- Mulyadi Robin
- Sen Sendjaya
- R. Liden
- N. Eva
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Dirk van Dierendonck
- Sen Sendjaya
- N. Eva
- R. Liden
- Jan G Langhof
- Stefan Güldenberg
- Madelyn Geldenhuys
- Michiel Frederick Coetzer
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jan G Langhof
- Madelyn Geldenhuys
- Dirk van Dierendonck
- Sen Sendjaya
- R. Liden
- N. Eva
- Stefan Güldenberg
Citations in the corpus
- Servant Leadership: A systematic literature review—toward a model of antecedents and outcomes (2019, background): “The definitions of the two concepts are widely congruent across the literature defining culture or climate as perceptions of practices, assumptions, and values shared among the group (Carter and Baghurst, 2013; Ebener and O’Connell, 2010; Hu and Liden, 2011; Huang et al., 2016; Jaramillo et al., 201”
- Impact of Servant Leadership on Performance: The Mediating Role of Affective and Cognitive Trust (2020, background): “Other studies examining the mediating role of trust treated it as a uni-dimensional variable (Jaramillo et al., 2015; Politis & Politis, 2017; Rosnani, 2018).”
- Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019, background): “Leader Behavioral control systems Follower SL perceptions Jaramillo et al. (2015)”
- The Functions of a Servant Leader (2017, background): “It was defined as being open to take calculated risks, standing up for what is morally right, despite negative adversary [31,46], and having high ethical conduct [13].”