Magnus Sverke

General Health Professions · 2002–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 32 researchers and is trusted by 31 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Magnus Sverke trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Kenneth A. Bollen
  2. Hans De Witte
  3. Johnny Hellgren
  4. K. Näswall
  5. S. Mauno
  6. Cary L. Cooper
  7. G. Mohr
  8. D. Hall
  9. Mel Fugate
  10. Yehuda Baruch

Who trusts Magnus Sverke overall

  1. Hans De Witte
  2. Antonio Chirumbolo
  3. Nele de Cuyper
  4. Tinne Vander Elst
  5. S. Mauno
  6. K. Näswall
  7. Alessandra Areni
  8. Ulla Kinnunen *
  9. A. Richter
  10. Beatrice Piccoli

Papers from Magnus Sverke's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Magnus Sverke trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  2. Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications
  3. Does job insecurity lead to impaired well-being or vice versa? Estimation of cross-lagged effects using latent variable modelling
  4. The Influence of Culture, Community, and the Nested-Self in the Stress Process: Advancing Conservation of Resources Theory
  5. Psychosocial work stressors and well-being: self-esteem and optimism as moderators in a one-year longitudinal sample
  6. Book Review : Structural Equations with Latent Variables Kenneth A. Bollen New York: Wiley, 1989, 514 pp., approx. $44.95
  7. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models (Behavior Research Methods)
  8. Job insecurity: Review of the international literature on definitions, prevalence, antecedents and consequences
  9. Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming
  10. How do occupational stressor-strain effects vary with time? A review and meta-analysis of the relevance of time lags in longitudinal studies

Their papers