Johnny Hellgren

General Health Professions · 2002–2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 35 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Johnny Hellgren trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Kenneth A. Bollen
  2. Magnus Sverke
  3. Cary L. Cooper
  4. S. Mauno
  5. G. Mohr
  6. K. Näswall
  7. Ulla Kinnunen *
  8. Tahira M. Probst
  9. E. Leskinen

Who trusts Johnny Hellgren overall

  1. Hans De Witte
  2. Antonio Chirumbolo
  3. Nele de Cuyper
  4. Tinne Vander Elst
  5. K. Näswall
  6. Alessandra Areni
  7. S. Mauno
  8. Magnus Sverke
  9. A. Richter
  10. E. Berntson

Papers from Johnny Hellgren's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Johnny Hellgren trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  2. Book Review : Structural Equations with Latent Variables Kenneth A. Bollen New York: Wiley, 1989, 514 pp., approx. $44.95
  3. Psychosocial work stressors and well-being: self-esteem and optimism as moderators in a one-year longitudinal sample
  4. Does job insecurity lead to impaired well-being or vice versa? Estimation of cross-lagged effects using latent variable modelling
  5. Job insecurity: Review of the international literature on definitions, prevalence, antecedents and consequences
  6. White‐collar reactions to job insecurity and the role of the psychological contract: Implications for human resource management
  7. `Objective' vs `Subjective' Job Insecurity: Consequences of Temporary Work for Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Four European Countries
  8. Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications
  9. Development and validation of the Job Security Index and the Job Security Satisfaction scale: A classical test theory and IRT approach
  10. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.

Their papers