A. Richter
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · with Näswall · 2014–2019
A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 19 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 36 citations into it
- General Health Professions — 30 citations into it
- Sociology and Political Science — 14 citations into it
- Social Psychology — 13 citations into it
- Management Science and Operations Research — 11 citations into it
- Applied Psychology — 8 citations into it
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology — 5 citations into it
Whom A. Richter trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Timothy A. Brown
- Andrew F. Hayes
- Paul E. Spector
- Rex Bryan Kline
- Herbert W. Marsh
- Magnus Sverke
- Hans De Witte
- Johnny Hellgren
- N. Conway
- J. Conway
Papers from A. Richter's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers A. Richter trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
- Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models (Behavior Research Methods)
- Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming
- Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. (Journal of Abnormal Psychology)
- Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research
- Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis
- A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research
- Does job insecurity lead to impaired well-being or vice versa? Estimation of cross-lagged effects using latent variable modelling
- Testing Structural Equation Models
- What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research