Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.
By D. Watson, L. Clark, A. Tellegen. 1988
Subfields: Cognitive Science & Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Science & Psychology
- Marylène Gagné
- Katsunori Sumi
- A. Mathews
- G. Oettingen
- Kentaro Fujita
- Yaacov Trope
- Eddie Harmon-Jones
- Richard M. Ryan
Citations in the corpus
- Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learned (2022, methodology): “These include versions of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [56] used in [15, 16, 31] and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) [17] used in [15, 16].”
- But Who Protects the Moderators? The Case of Crowdsourced Image Moderation (2018, background): “ke a survey about their subjective experience completing the task. The survey contains question measuring various variables including positive and negative experience [Diener et al. 2010] and affect [Watson et al. 1988; Thompson 2007], emotional exhaustion [Wharton 1993; Coates and Howe 2015], and p”
- On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments (2003, background): “rate on the 20 items of the PANAS (Watson et al., 1988) how they would”
- Measures of five aspects of affective well-being at work (2000, background): “…and positive affect; the association between depression and low positive affect (Tellegen, 1985); and that depression can be characterized by low positive affectivity and high negative affectivity, but anxiety can be characterized solely by high negative affectivity (see Watson et al., 1988a).”
- High self-esteem buffers negative feedback: Once more with feeling (2010, methodology): “…humiliated, pleased with myself, proud); the remaining 18 items were taken from the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) developed by Watson, Clark, and Tellegen (1988).3 These items measure general positive and negative emotional states (e.g., determined, enthusiastic, irritable,…”
- Social power and emotional experience: Actor and partner effects within dyadic interactions (2008, background): “These predictions treat positive and negative emotions as orthogonal systems (e.g., Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988, but see Cacioppo & Berntson, 1994).”
- Goal Motives, Well-Being, and Physical Health: An Integrative Model (2008, background): “It reflects pleasurable engagement with the environment and includes the degree to which one feels enthusiastic, alert, and active ( Watson, Clark, & Carey, 1988 ).”