Zakary L. Tormala

Sociology and Political Science · 2001–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 19 papers; trusts 28 researchers and is trusted by 32 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Zakary L. Tormala trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Richard E. Petty
  2. P. Briñol
  3. Derek D. Rucker
  4. H. Bless
  5. George Y. Bizer
  6. Chanthika Pornpitakpan
  7. Larissa Z. Tiedens
  8. Durairaj Maheswaran
  9. John T. Cacioppo
  10. Joseph P. Forgas

Who trusts Zakary L. Tormala overall

  1. P. Briñol
  2. Richard E. Petty
  3. Derek D. Rucker
  4. Christina Peter
  5. L. Bergkvist
  6. Yanmengqian Zhou
  7. James N. Druckman
  8. Thomas Koch
  9. Uwe Peters
  10. Gerard Bohner

Papers from Zakary L. Tormala's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Zakary L. Tormala trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  2. Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  3. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. (Psychological methods)
  4. Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation (Personality and Social Psychology Review)
  5. The Influence of Spokesperson Trustworthiness on Message Elaboration, Attitude Strength, and Advertising Effectiveness
  6. Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment.
  7. MULTIPLE ROLES FOR SOURCE CREDIBILITY UNDER HIGH ELABORATION: IT'S ALL IN THE TIMING
  8. Self‐Validation of Cognitive Responses to Advertisements
  9. The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  10. Establishing a causal chain: why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)

Their papers