11. The role of metacognition in social judgment

By Richard E. Petty, P. Turnes, Zakary L. Tormala, Duane T. Wegener. 2007

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7e60a1e9db3d5d584ecbe31dc03a5dca2d8606a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Research Note - When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth (2015, background): “(Petty et al. 2007).”
FLUENCY AND THE DETECTION OF MISLEADING QUESTIONS : LOW PROCESSING FLUENCY ATTENUATES THE MOSES ILLUSION (2008, unknown): “Moreover, opinions based on fluently processed material are held with greater confidence (Petty et al., 2007), whereas disfluent processing reduces tABle 2.”
Consumer Resistance: Proposal for an Integrative Framework (2007, background): “While an individual’s thoughts on general subjects are considered “primary thoughts”, metacognition refers to thoughts “that occur at a second level which involve reflections on the first-level thoughts” (Petty et al., 2007).”
What's in a frame anyway?: A meta-cognitive analysis of the impact of one versus two sided message framing on attitude certainty (2008, background): “The inference process itself is metacognitive in nature as it reflects consumers' perceptions of their own cognitive processes in reaching their attitudes (Petty et al., 2007).”
Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty (2014, background): “Following the general logic that metacognitive reasoning requires cognitive effort (Petty et al., 2007), we propose that the appraisal process will be most likely to occur when people have high motivation and ability to think.”
PERSUASION: INSIGHTS FROM THE SELF VALIDATION HYPOTHESIS (2009, background): “The perceived origin of the thoughts is an important dimension of meta-cognition (Petty et al., 2007).”
Consumer evaluation of copycat brands: The effect of imitation type (2012, unknown): “Likewise, in a United States survey, Scott-Morton and Zettelmeyer (2004) found that half of the store brands surveyed were similar to a national brand package in color, size, and shape.”