Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect.
By Piotr Winkielman, John T. Cacioppo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
996 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/058338b6fac380c7fa09cd23e2a65f2cc61cca52
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Adam L. Alter
- Paul J Silvia
- Helmut Leder
- Claus-Christian Carbon
- Daniel M. Oppenheimer
- Zakary L. Tormala
- Norbert Schwarz
- Aparna A. Labroo
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Claus-Christian Carbon
- Helmut Leder
- I. Hoever
- D. van Knippenberg
- Norbert Schwarz
- F. Strack
- Richard E. Petty
- P. Briñol
Citations in the corpus
- Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making (2004, background): “On the other hand, fluency elicits spontaneous affective reactions, which can be captured by psychophysiological measures (e.g., Winkielman & Cacioppo, 2001).”
- Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. (2007, background): “Research shows that images that are easily processed—by virtue of familiarity, priming, or perceptual contrast—are more pleasant (Winkielman & Cacioppo, 2001), although researchers disagree over whether fluent processing is inherently positive (Winkielman, Schwarz, Fazendeiro, & Reber, 2003) or not…”
- Artistic Training and Interest in Visual Art: Applying the Appraisal Model of Aesthetic Emotions (2006, background): “Processing fluency can stem from individual differences (e.g., familiarity with an object), or it can be manipulated (e.g., priming the object’s geonic structure; Winkielman & Cacioppo, 2001).”
- The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence (2009, background): “…we assume to underlie this kind of intuition: Semantic coherence facilitates semantic processing which causes coherent triads to be processed faster than expected (cf. Reber et al., 2004), which creates a brief and subtle positive affect (cf. Winkielman & Cacioppo, 2001; Winkielman et al., 2003).”
- Beauty as an Emotion: The Exhilarating Prospect of Mastering a Challenging World (2008, background): “Winkielman and Cacioppo (2001) used facial electromyography to show that processing fluency engages the zygomaticus (the “smiling muscle”) and therefore produces genuine, “hot” affect.”
- Infants' Differential Processing of Female and Male Faces (2006, positive): “Once infants become more expert at processing female faces than male faces, the asymmetry may cascade because ease of processing is linked to affective preferences (Winkielman & Cacioppo, 2001).”
- Between Two Brands: A Goal Fluency Account of Brand Evaluation (2006, background): “The implication is that when consumers are exposed to an advertisement, the goal structure of the advertised brand becomes activated and, in turn, facilitates (impairs) the processing of goal-compatible (goal-conflicting) brands they subsequently encounter.”
- The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions (2009, background): “Winkielman and Cacioppo ( 2001 ) manipulated processing fluency of pictures that showed neutral everyday objects via visual priming and presentation duration and assessed facial activity using facial EMG.”
- Value from hedonic experience and engagement. (2006, background): “Fluency constitutes relatively easy processing when perceiving or remembering something, and it has been found to create positive value because it makes one feel secure or puts one's " mind at ease " (Freitas, Azizian, Travers, & Berry, in press; Winkielman & Cacioppo, 2001).”
- Isn't It Cute: An Evolutionary Perspective of Baby-Schema Effects in Visual Product Designs (2011, positive): “…overt expressions (e.g., Facial Activation Coding System, Ekman & Friesen, 1975), facial EMG reliably captures changes in positive and negative affective states even when overt facial expressions are absent (Cacioppo, Petty, Losch, & Kim, 1986; Dimberg et al., 2000; Winkielman & Cacioppo, 2001).”