The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation

By Baiyin Yang, Karen E. Watkins, Victoria J. Marsick. 2004

809 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1825cb7ae411ec9aadcc80ddecd14665e3d70e1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Predictors of organizational commitment in India: strategic HR roles, organizational learning capability and psychological empowerment (2007, background): “The third is the learning climate perspective, which sees the learning organization as one that facilitates the learning of its employees (Yang et al., 2004).”
Measuring the learning organization culture, organizational commitment and job satisfaction in the Lebanese banking sector (2009, background): “The learning organization concept represents an area of study that is continuously evolving, with respect to not only the application of relevant theory but also the development and consolidation of such theory (Yang, Watkins, and Marsick 2004 ).”
Is the learning organization a valid concept in the Taiwanese context (2006, result): “These findings are comparable to those obtained by previous studies (Ellinger et al., 2002; Yang et al., 2004).”
Structural determinants of team performance: the mutual influences of learning culture, creativity, and knowledge (2010, background): “Researchers point out that: (a) innovative work teams are the main source of learning organization (Senge 1990 ); (b) individual inquiries and acceptance of new practices at the team-level are building blocks of organizational explicit knowledge (Nonaka, Takeuchi, and Umemoto 1996 ); and (c) the e”
Learning organization and work engagement: the mediating role of employee resilience (2020, methodology): “It was measured by using Yang, Watkins, and Marsick (2004) ‘Dimensions of the Learning Organization questionnaire’ (DLOQ).”
Factors that influence informal learning in the workplace (2008, background): “The DLOQ measures seven dimensions of an organization’s learning practices and culture, which are grouped into three levels – individual, group, and organizational, with acceptable levels of validity and reliability (Marsick and Watkins, 2003b; Yang, 2003; Yang et al., 2004).”
Effects of inclusive leadership on organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating roles of organizational justice and learning culture (2019, methodology): “Further, organizational learning culture supplies employees with rich opportunities to master new knowledge (Yang et al., 2004) and thus enhances employees’ feelings of receiving favorable treatment from their organization.”
The Effects of Organizational Learning Culture, Perceived Job Complexity, and Proactive Personality on Organizational Commitment and Intrinsic Motivation (2009, background): “Coefficient alphas for the seven dimensions ranged from .68 to .83 (Yang et al., 2004).”
The Dimensions of Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ): A validation study in a Korean context (2009, methodology): “Analysis of CFA is the appropriate method to validate the hypothesized measurement for three reasons: (1) measurement of the DLOQ has been developed on a theoretical basis; (2) it verifies the adequacy of the item-to-factor associations; and (3) it examines the construct validity of theoretically pr”
Knowledge Sharing: The Influences of Learning Organization Culture, Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (2011, background): “Coefficient alphas for the seven dimensions ranged from .68 to .83 (Yang et al., 2004).”
Examining the relationship between learning organization characteristics and change adaptation, innovation, and organizational performance (2005, neutral): “…have been made to clarify and distinguish the two concepts (Argyris, 1999; Argyris & Schön, 1996; DiBella, 1995; Easterby-Smith & Araujo, 1999; Finger & Brand, 1999; Griego et al., 2000; Marquardt, 1996; Marsick & Watkins, 1994; West & Burnes, 2000; Yang, Watkins, & Marsick, 2004; Tsang, 1997).”