Suk Bong Choi

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · 2011–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 55 researchers and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Suk Bong Choi trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. James R. Detert
  2. Arnold B. Bakker
  3. Barbara L. Fredrickson
  4. Abraham Carmeli
  5. Kristopher J Preacher
  6. Andrew F. Hayes
  7. Philip M. Podsakoff
  8. B. Joo
  9. Amy C. Edmondson
  10. Evangelia Demerouti

Who trusts Suk Bong Choi overall

  1. Quinetta Roberson
  2. Thi Bich Hanh Tran
  3. Yongjia Lin
  4. Suman Lodh
  5. Victor Zitian Chen
  6. Phillip M. Jolly
  7. J. Perry
  8. Basharat Javed
  9. X. Fu
  10. Kevin Zheng Zhou

Papers from Suk Bong Choi's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Suk Bong Choi trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. (American Psychologist)
  2. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  3. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. (Psychological methods)
  4. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models (Behavoir research methods, instruments & computers)
  5. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
  6. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis.
  7. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  8. The job demands-resources model : state of the art
  9. Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance
  10. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. (Psychological methods)

Their papers