Public service motivation and job performance of public sector employees in the Netherlands

By P. Leisink, B. Steijn. 2009

268 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01d00ff18522d1c4c99117efb742af805ceaf3c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Public Administration

Citations in the corpus

Government Employees’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Impacts of Public Service Motivation, Organizational Identification, and Subjective OCB Norms (2017, background): “…and behavioral variables such as organizational commitment (Crewson 1997; Leisink and Steijn 2009; Taylor 2007), job satisfaction (Steijn 2008; Taylor 2007), job performance (Bellé 2013; Leisink and Steijn 2009; Vandenabeele 2009), and job choice decisions (Christensen and Wright 2011).”
Public Service Motivation, User Orientation, and Job Satisfaction: A Question of Employment Sector? (2013, background): “…public and private sector employees who belong to the same occupational group and accordingly perform similar services, but the composition of occupations still varies between the employment sectors, and occupation is therefore an important control variable (see also Leisink and Steijn 2009, 47).”
Public Service Motivation and Professionalism (2012, background): “Are professionals more or less motivated by doing good for others and society than other providers of public services? Does socialization within an occupational group with norms and specialized, theoretical knowledge increase public service motivation (PSM), or is altruistic motivation replaced by p”
A meta-analysis of the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction (2015, background): “A range of studies have provided evidence for PSM in single countries, including Denmark (Anderson 2009), Malta (Camilleri 2007), South Korea (Kim 2006), China (Liu, Tang, and Zhu 2008), Switzerland (Ritz 2009), and Australia (Taylor 2007).”
On the bright and dark side of public service motivation: the relationship between PSM and employee wellbeing (2015, background): “Previous research on PSM has shown that the positive relationship between PSM and employee wellbeing depends on whether it is possible to have an impact on society through the job (Bright, 2008; Leisink and Steijn, 2009; Taylor, 2013).”
When Does Public Service Motivation Fuel the Job Satisfaction Fire? The Joint Moderation of Person–Organization Fit and Needs–Supplies Fit (2015, background): “2008), job performance (Alonso and Lewis 2001; Frank and Lewis 2004; Leisink and Steijn 2009), and organization performance (Brewer et al.”
High-Performance Human Resource Practices and Employee Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Public Service Motivation (2015, background): “Th ey will then be desirous of displaying attitudes and behaviors of beneﬁ t to the organization, as evidenced by their aﬀ ective commitment and displays of OCBs (Gould-Williams et al. 2014; Kim 2006, 2012; Leisink and Steijn 2009).”
Public service motivation and performance: The role of organizational identification (2018, background): “Camilleri and Van der Heijden (2007), Leisink and Steijn (2009) and Vandenabeele (2009) also found evidence of a positive relationship in their studies of Maltese, Dutch and Belgian government employees.”
Leadership and public service motivation: a systematic synthesis (2021, background): “…has been generally understood as an antecedent to a wide range of behaviors, inter alia, job performance (Bell e 2013; Alonso and Lewis 2001; Leisink and Steijn 2009), organizational commitment (Crewson 1997; Leisink and Steijn 2009), organizational and interpersonal citizenship behaviors…”
Motivating Employees of the Public Sector: Does Public Service Motivation Matter? (2010, background): “On the other hand, some authors relate PSM to organizational (Kim 2005; Ritz 2009) and individual (Leisink and Steijn 2009; Alonso and Lewis 2001) performance, even though the empirical evidence for a positive relationship is very small (Brewer 2008).”
Factors Affecting Job Performance: A Review of Literature (2012, background): “Research related PSM has revealed the result from logistic regression about the effect of PSM on job performance (β = 1.123, p .01) (Leisink and Steijn, 2009).”
HRM Practices, Intrinsic Motivators, and Organizational Performance in the Public Sector (2013, methodology): “Leisink and Steijn (2009), in contrast, used only one.”
Clarifying the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and In-Role and Extra-Role Behaviors: The Relative Contributions of Person-Job and Person-Organization Fit (2017, methodology): “Empirical research has found that PSM is positively related to organizational commitment, job satisfaction, job performance (Leisink & Steijn, 2009; Vandenabeele, 2009), extra-role behavior (Gould-Williams, Mostafa, & Bottomley, 2013; Kim, 2006), supervisor ratings (Bright, 2007), and even student…”