The Impact of Personality on Psychological Contracts
By Usman Raja, G. Johns, Filotheos Ntalianis. 2004
880 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/594b4249baba160e1a33c8dec7893e2ba6d91560
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Information Systems and Management
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- The relations between work centrality, psychological contracts, and job attitudes: The influence of age (2011, background): “…similar correlations between the two types of psychological contract with turnover intentions have been found for the Rousseau measure (transactional r¼ .37; relational r¼7.60; Dabos & Rousseau, 2004) and the Millward and Hopkins measure (transactional r¼ .26; relational r¼7.57; Raja et al., 2004).”
- Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Management Systems (2014, background): “Employees low in consci-entiousness tend to be more concerned with economic rewards (Raja et al., 2004).”
- Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation of knowledge, and knowledge sharing (2011, methodology): “852) NEO inventories have been extensively tested and validated (Mooradian and Olver 1997; Renner 2002; Raja et al. 2004).”
- THE IMPACT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH ON WORK‐RELATED OUTCOMES: A META‐ANALYSIS (2007, background): “For example, Webb (1996) identified mistrust as part of emotional distress, and Raja et al. (2004) explicitly defined mistrust as an emotional response to breach (p. 354).”
- Untangling Employee Loyalty: A Psychological Contract Perspective (2007, background): “For instance, Raja, Johns, and Ntalianis (2004) have shown that personality traits predispose employees to particular types of contracts: neuroticism and equity sensitivity are related to transactional contracts, while conscientiousness and self-esteem are associated with relational contracts.”
- How similar are personality scales of the “same” construct? A meta-analytic investigation (2010, neutral): “…Validity Study Criteria Personality Factors Piedmont & Weinstein, 1994 Task/Technical/Overall Performance, OCB/Contextual Performance O, C, E, A, N Raja et al, 2004 Withdrawal C, E, N Reid-Seiser & Fritzsche, 2001 Task/Technical/Overall Performance, CWB/Deviance O, C, E, A, N Roman, 1997…”
- A Time-Lagged Study of the Relationship Between Big Five Personality and Ethical Ideology (2016, background): “Due to fear and lack of confidence, these individuals avoid being a leader and feel uncomfortable harming others (Raja et al., 2004).”