How similar are personality scales of the “same” construct? A meta-analytic investigation
By Victoria L. Pace, Michael T. Brannick. 2010
131 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99cc2d1971a5ba128f9e9035ec2d21ceb35ba3ff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- P. D. Harms
- M. Tynan
- Marcus Crede
- Michael A. McDaniel
- R. Mõttus
- Michael T. Kalkbrenner
- Ju Seong Lee
- J. DeSimone
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Sven Kepes
- P. D. Harms
- Marcus Crede
- Michael A. McDaniel
- R. Mõttus
- Michael T. Kalkbrenner
- Karolina W. Nieberle
- Susanne Braun
Citations in the corpus
- Towards More Rigorous Personality Trait–Outcome Research (2016, background): “This justifies that researchers use different questionnaires and yet claim to have measured the same FFM traits (Pace & Brannick, 2010).”
- Much Ado About Grit: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis of the Grit Literature (2017, background): “…course, encouraging, but the only moderately high correlations among scores on most personality traits assessed via two different inventories (see Pace & Brannick, 2010) mean that such incremental validity findings would be observed even if grit was simply a different manifestation of…”
- How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology? (2013, background): “Relatedly, different scales for the same construct may yield differing results (e.g., personality constructs; Pace & Brannick, 2010).”