Scott I. Tannenbaum
Social Psychology · 2003–2018
A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 21 researchers and is trusted by 11 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Social Psychology — 91 citations into it; #4,321 of 15,694 by trust here, #2,207 by citations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management — 76 citations into it; #8,596 of 8,741 by trust here, #3,494 by citations
- Applied Psychology — 46 citations into it; #2,862 of 3,868 by trust here, #1,285 by citations
- Sociology and Political Science — 27 citations into it; #22,368 of 22,756 by trust here, #18,468 by citations
- Communication — 23 citations into it
- Management Science and Operations Research — 18 citations into it
- Education — 17 citations into it; #8,290 of 11,309 by trust here, #4,358 by citations
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 11 citations into it
Whom Scott I. Tannenbaum trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Eduardo Salas
- J. Hunter
- Leslie A. DeChurch
- Suzanne T. Bell
- Jessica Mesmer-Magnus
- John E. Mathieu
- Frank L. Schmidt
- Herman Aguinis
- David A. Harrison
- Kevin J. Murphy
Who trusts Scott I. Tannenbaum overall
- Christopher P. Cerasoli
- John E. Mathieu
- Eduardo Salas
- Richard K. Ladyshewsky
- George M. Alliger
- Raymond A. Noe
- Hui-Teng Hoo
- Jamie S. Donsbach
- Nancy J. Cooke
- Angelique Hartwig
Papers from Scott I. Tannenbaum's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Scott I. Tannenbaum trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
- Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams (Psychological Science in the Public Interest)
- Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
- Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
- Work Groups and Teams in Organizations
- Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis
- The science of training: a decade of progress. (Annual Review of Psychology)
- What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations.
- Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. (American Psychologist)
- Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. (Annual Review of Psychology)
Their papers
- Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis (2013) — 548 citations
- A Review and Integration of Team Composition Models (2014) — 444 citations
- Guided Team Self-Correction (2008) — 228 citations
- What’s in a Name? A Literature-Based Approach to Understanding Mentoring, Coaching, and Other Constructs That Describe Developmental Interactions (2003) — 269 citations
- Helping teams to help themselves: : comparing two team-led debriefing methods (2013) — 110 citations
- INDIVIDUAL AND SITUATIONAL INFLUENCES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SELF‐EFFICACY: IMPLICATIONS FOR TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS (2006) — 328 citations
- Antecedents and Outcomes of Informal Learning Behaviors: a Meta-Analysis (2018) — 278 citations
- Team resilience: How teams flourish under pressure. (2015) — 227 citations
- The Science of Training and Development in Organizations (2012) — 1,171 citations
- Informal learning and development in organizations. (2010) — 167 citations