Helping teams to help themselves: : comparing two team-led debriefing methods

By Erik R. Eddy, Scott I. Tannenbaum, John E. Mathieu. 2013

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/958c5c8cb2e1ba2d77a5b5c2e9971a6cd9b13942

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. M. Schippers

In Social Psychology

1. Matthew J. W. McLarnon
2. Thomas A. O'Neill
3. M. Schippers

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Matthew J. W. McLarnon
2. Thomas A. O'Neill
3. M. Schippers
4. D. van Knippenberg

Citations in the corpus

• Social Loafing Tendencies and Team Performance: The Compensating Effect of Agreeableness and Conscientiousness (2014, background): “Recent research showed that a team-led guided debrief intervention resulted in improved team processes and performance, as well as enhanced readiness for teamwork, and enthusiasm for teaming (Eddy et al., 2013).”
• Optimizing team conflict dynamics for high performance teamwork (2017, result): “Although several other studies have investigated and found team-related benefits from developing norms (e.g., Eddy et al., 2013), few have investigated the role norms may have in influencing conflict management.”