A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
By M. Marks, John E. Mathieu, Stephen J. Zaccaro. 2001
3,676 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d9a06d2569a27b143a413541c17fca544c77f23
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Sharon K. Parker
- Arnold B. Bakker
- D. van Knippenberg
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- Adam M. Grant
- John E. Mathieu
- Michael S. Cole
- Abraham Carmeli
In Social Psychology
- John E. Mathieu
- Steve W. J. Kozlowski
- D. van Knippenberg
- Sharon K. Parker
- Lucy L. Gilson
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Stephen E. Humphrey
- Federico Aime
In Sociology and Political Science
- Michael S. Cole
- Jin Nam Choi
- Thomas A. O'Neill
- Steve W. J. Kozlowski
- John E. Mathieu
- Lindred L. Greer
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Matthew J. W. McLarnon
Citations in the corpus
- The Science of Multiteam Systems (2015, background): “From a behavioral process perspective, coordination, communication, leadership, and, more broadly, the action and transition processes described by Marks et al. (2001) have been studied in the MTS context, with differential effects being found for the inter- and intra-team levels such as those…”
- Trust as a predictor of innovation network ties in project teams (2015, background): “We join recent and emerging research (Levin and Cross, 2004; Marks et al., 2001; Schulte et al., 2010) to argue that trust is the over-arching attitudinal construct that drives tie formation for innovation in social networks.”
- Workplace team resilience: A systematic review and conceptual development (2020, background): “Team emergent states may be defined as “cognitive, motivational, and affective states of teams, as opposed to the nature of their member interaction . . . [that are] products of team experiences (including team processes)” (Marks et al., 2001, p. 357–358).”
- Teacher team commitment, teamwork and trust: exploring associations (2005, background): “Team success, assertedly, is a function of team members’ talents, available resources and processes that team members employ to interact with each other in order to get work accomplished (Marks et al., 2001).”
- Embracing Complexity: Reviewing the Past Decade of Team Effectiveness Research (2019, positive): “Team Processes Marks et al. (2001) also argued that team processes contain 10 facets that map onto three dimensions—transition, action, and interpersonal processes—and occur in varying episodic cycles cycles.”
- Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future (2008, methodology): “Numerous authors have also emphasized that time plays a critical role in team functioning that is not adequately depicted in typical unidirectional I→P→O frameworks (Ancona & Chong, 1999; Marks et al., 2001; McGrath, 1991).”