Guided Team Self-Correction
By Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch, J. Cannon-Bowers, Scott I. Tannenbaum, Eduardo Salas. 2008
228 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e599e4f1a0ad99c69d03ac47062990bd52789446
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
In Social Psychology
- Nancy J. Cooke
- Eduardo Salas
- M. Rosen
- M. Hilton
- C. Behavioral
- Scott I. Tannenbaum
- Deborah DiazGranados
- Christopher P. Cerasoli
Citations in the corpus
- Expertise-Based Intuition and Decision Making in Organizations (2010, background): “Effective debriefing involves meaningful reflection and facilitated self-evaluation by team members regarding their own performance and open discussion of performance successes and gaps (Prince, Salas, Brannick, & Orasanu, 2005; Smith-Jentsch et al., 2008).”
- Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015, methodology): “Finally, it has been used as a tool to support on-the-job performance improvement through accident investigations within the nuclear power industry and to debrief one organization’s response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11 (Smith-Jentsch et al., 2008).”
- Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis (2013, background): “Three studies were flagged as potential outliers (d = 4.71, 2.83, 3.81, respectively: O’Donnell et al., 2010; Qudrat-Ullah, 2007; and Smith-Jentsch et al., 2008).”