Does Public Service Motivation Really Make a Difference on the Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions of Public Employees?
By Leonard Bright. 2008
534 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/193c1e9237b4b2320f2909ebf6e6728d6ecb02f9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- J. Caillier
- Branda Nowell
- Bangcheng Liu
- Kaifeng Yang
- Neil M. Boyd
- D. Shim
- A. A. Khan
- Samina Quratulain
In Public Administration
- J. Caillier
- Bangcheng Liu
- Kaifeng Yang
- A. Kjeldsen
- Neil M. Boyd
- Branda Nowell
- J. Perry
- L. B. Andersen
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Red Tape, Resigned Satisfaction, Public Service Motivation, and Negative Employee Attitudes and Behaviors (2015, methodology): “While several previous studies suggest that PSM positively affects work-relevant attitudes (Bright, 2008; Steijn, 2008; Vandenabeele, 2009), our study is among the first few that demonstrate the dark side of PSM. Individuals working in public organizations encompass different public service…”
- Public Service Motivation, User Orientation, and Job Satisfaction: A Question of Employment Sector? (2013, methodology): “However, we have chosen to still include it as a control variable because some studies indicate that there may be a relationship between job satisfaction and education (Bright 2008, 160; Naff and Crum 1999, 12).”
- Street-level bureaucrats’ turnover intention: does public service motivation matter? (2017, methodology): “For example, Bright (2008) found that the person–organization fit was a significant variable in explaining government employees’ turnover intention and that the influence of job satisfaction on turnover intention became insignificant when the person–organization fit was included in the empirical…”
- Testing the mediation effect of person–organization fit on the relationship between high performance HR practices and employee outcomes in the Egyptian public sector (2014, background): “P-O fit: the mechanism linking HPHRP to employee outcomes P-O fit is one of the most widely studied topics in the fields of organizational behaviour and general management (Bright 2008).”
- The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: more robust evidence of the PSM—performance relationship (2009, background): “This combination of PSM and of person–environment fit has already been investigated theoretically (Vandenabeele, 2007) and empirically (Bright, 2007, 2008; Steijn, 2008; Taylor, 2008; Vandenabeele, 2008b), but some methodological and conceptual issues need to be sorted out before these analyses can…”
- Sense of community, sense of community responsibility, organizational commitment and identification, and public service motivation: a simultaneous test of affective states on employee well-being and engagement in a public service work context (2020, background): “Bright (2008) investigated the relationship of PSM to worker satisfaction, finding no direct relationship for PSM after controlling for person-environment fit. Also, Quratulain and Khan (2015) found that PSM can actually exacerbate negative employee attitudes and behaviour for employees working in s”
- Determinants of Whistleblowing Within Government Agencies (2015, background): “Perceived organizational support (POS) is positively related to affective commitment, OCBs, cooperation, and job satisfaction (Randall, Cropanzano, Bormann, & Birjulin, 1999; Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002).”
- On passion and heavy work investment: personal and organizational outcomes (2013, background): “Turnover intentions reflect how workers foresee their employment (Bright, 2008) and commitment to their work, organization, or profession.”
- Person–Organization Fit and Turnover Intention: Exploring the Mediating Role of Employee Followership and Job Satisfaction Through Conservation of Resources Theory (2016, methodology): “P-O fit was measured using four items from Bright (2008) whose items were developed from a review of prior research (e.g., C. I. O’Reilly & Chatman, 1986).”
- A meta-analysis of the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction (2015, methodology): “As mentioned in the introduction, mixed fi ndings have been produced regarding the PSM–job satisfaction relationship (Bright 2008; Steijn 2008; Taylor 2008).”
- Does Public Service Motivation Mediate the Relationship between Goal Clarity and both Organizational Commitment and Extra-Role Behaviours? (2016, result): “The author’s reasoning was that unlike the United States, ‘PSM does not function as an effective sorting mechanism in Korea’ (836–7).”
- Public sector motivation ad fonts : Personality traits as antecedents of the motivation to serve the public interest (2017, methodology): “This measure has been used in several studies (see, for example, Bright, 2008; Taylor, 2007).”
- Work-Related Stressors and Health-Related Outcomes in Public Service (2015, methodology): “Most studies so far have used this approach (e.g., Bright, 2008; Christensen & Wright, 2011).”
- Organizational Control Systems and Pay-for-Performance in the Public Service (2013, methodology): “Following these ideas, Bright (2007, 2008) establishes person-organization fit as a mediator between public service motivation and performance.”
- Motivating Employees of the Public Sector: Does Public Service Motivation Matter? (2010, background): “They will also be more satisfied with their jobs (Naff and Crum 1999; Bright 2008; Taylor 2007; Taylor 2008).”