Mien S. R. Segers

Education · 2001–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 26 papers; trusts 57 researchers and is trusted by 54 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Mien S. R. Segers trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Filip Dochy
  2. K. Scouller
  3. David Kember
  4. J. Nijhuis
  5. K. Trigwell
  6. L. Shepard
  7. N. Falchikov
  8. Nigel K. L. Pope
  9. D. Gijbels
  10. Keith Topping

Who trusts Mien S. R. Segers overall

  1. D. Gijbels
  2. Filip Dochy
  3. Marlies Baeten
  4. Eva Kyndt
  5. Katrien Struyven
  6. Diana Pereira
  7. Maria Assunção Flores
  8. M. Barak
  9. Ernesto Panadero
  10. P. Van den Bossche

Papers from Mien S. R. Segers's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Mien S. R. Segers trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. (British Journal of Educational Psychology)
  2. University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice
  3. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective.
  4. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  5. Approaches to Studying and Perceptions of the Academic Environment in Students Following Problem-Based and Subject-Based Curricula
  6. The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay
  7. Evaluating the Consequential Validity of New Modes of Assessment: The Influence of Assessment on Learning, Including Pre-, Post-, and True Assessment Effects
  8. How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context
  9. Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility
  10. Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries

Their papers