Peer Assessment as a Collaborative Learning Activity: The Role of Interpersonal Variables and Conceptions.

265 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective (2010, methodology): “Concerning terminology, it is remarkable that while Van Gennip et al. (2010) and Van Zundert et al. (2010) were talking about ‘‘peer assessment’’, Van Steendam et al. (2010) as well as Cho and MacArthur (2010) used ‘‘peer revision’’ to describe the phenomenon.”
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions (2010, background): “Van den Berg, Admiraal, and Pilot (2006) found that adequate timing and small group work were beneficial for learning from revisions on the basis of peer feedback.”
Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills (2018, background): “…friendship marking due to friendship bonds, psychological unsafety, fear of disapproval when giving a low score or negative feedback (i.e., recrimination), and distrust in one’s own and others’ evaluative capabilities (e.g., Harris and Brown 2013; van Gennip et al. 2010; Vanderhoven et al. 2015).”
Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models (2017, background): “Peer feedback is provided by ‘equal status learners’ and can be viewed both as a form of formative assessment (Topping, 1998), and as a form of collaborative learning (Van Gennip et al., 2010).”