Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis.
By C. D. De Dreu, Laurie R. Weingart. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003
3,093 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7778250d2fc6fe6a3110c327b213ea228c8ca683
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- D. van Knippenberg
- Lindred L. Greer
- Bertolt Meyer
- Astrid C. Homan
- Karen A. Jehn
- Eric Kearney
- Aparna Joshi
- L. Nishii
In Social Psychology
- D. van Knippenberg
- John E. Mathieu
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Sharon K. Parker
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- M. Schippers
- Carsten K. W. De Dreu
- Steve W. J. Kozlowski
In Sociology and Political Science
- D. van Knippenberg
- Lindred L. Greer
- Carsten K. W. De Dreu
- Karen A. Jehn
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Dean Tjosvold
- Astrid C. Homan
Citations in the corpus
- Passive responses to interpersonal conflict at work amplify employee strain (2009, methodology): “In Samples 1 and 2 the same questions were used to assess the occurrence of interpersonal conflict over task issues and over relationship issues (see De Dreu & Weingart, 2003).”
- Beyond Team Types and Taxonomies: A Dimensional Scaling Conceptualization for Team Description (2012, methodology): “For example, De Dreu and Weingart (2003) quantitatively reviewed the literature on team conflict from 1993 to 2002 and used neither of these previous systems.”
- Too Unsafe to Monitor? How Board–CEO Cognitive Conflict and Chair Leadership Shape Outside Director Monitoring (2020, background): “…cognitive conflict undermines decision-making when the group is incapable of adequately reflecting on and integrating divergent views brought to the table (de Dreu & Weingart, 2003; de Wit et al., 2012; Gamero, González-Romá, & Peiró, 2008; Gardner, Gino, & Staats, 2012;Mooney et al., 2007).”
- Reframing the Decision-Makers’ Dilemma: Towards a Social Context Model of Creative Idea Recognition (2017, background): “For example, if different assessments give rise to perceived value differences between actors in and not in decision-making roles, this could lead to relationship conflict—a type of conflict shown consistently to harm performance (De Dreu & Weingart, 2003; Jehn, 1995).”
- Effects of conflict management strategies on perceptions of intragroup conflict. (2007, methodology): “However, numerous studies have pointed out that the two types of conflict tend to coexist in groups (De Dreu & Weingart, 2003b; Simons & Peterson, 2000; Tidd, McIntyre, & Friedman, 2004).”
- Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams (2007, background): “…by representational gaps will provide reasons why task conflict (which is what representational gaps create) is generally not helpful for teams (De Dreu & Weingart, 2003), despite the widely held belief that it should be (e.g., Amason & Schweiger, 1997; Si- mons & Peterson, 2000; Van de Vliert &…”
- Innovation in top management teams: Minority dissent, transformational leadership, and radical innovations (2014, background): “One reason is that task and relationship conflict are often positively associated, and relationship conflict undermines the beneficial effects of task conflict (De Dreu & Weingart, 2003; De Wit et al., 2012; also see Chen et al., 2005).”
- Social influence, creativity and innovation (2008, background): “However, De Dreu and Weingart's ( 2003 ) meta‐analysis found that both relationship conflict and task conflict hurt team performance.”
- Team identification, trust and conflict: a mediation model (2010, methodology): “…good deal of literature indicating that task conflict is constructive while relationship conflict is destructive, empirical evidence has painted a somewhat negative picture of the overall effect of both task and relationship conflict on performance (De Dreu and Weingart, 2003; Ilgen et al., 2005).”
- Team learning: building shared mental models (2011, background): “The role of conflict, as the process resulting from differences in point of view, is highly relevant here (De Dreu & Weingart, 2003).”
- A Multilevel View of Intragroup Conflict (2008, methodology): “Research on intragroup conflict has demonstrated the powerful and often detrimental effects of conflict for group effectiveness (DeDreu & Weingart, 2003; Hambrick, 2007).”