A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance Relationship

By Artemis Chang, P. Bordia. 2001

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93d91bec058265f9bb4831fe69af428ad5962299

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Leadership and Team Cohesiveness Across Cultures (2009, background): “…Bachrach, 2000), reduction of destructive conflicts (Jehn & Mannix, 2001; Nibler & Harris, 2003), and improved performance at the individual level (Chang & Bordia, 2001; Langfred, 1998), and at the team level (Dion, 2000; Mullen & Copper, 1994; Shields & Gardner, 1997), as well as with innovation…”
Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes during argumentation in collaborative learning interaction (2017, background): “The kappa value was sufficient for all categories. socio-emotional processes, particularly of group satisfaction (Chang & Bordia, 2001), cohesion (Sargent & Sue-Chan, 2001), and psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999).”
Crossover of Burnout and Engagement in Work Teams (2006, methodology): “Work pressure was based on a Dutch version (Furda, 1995) of Karasek’s (1985) job content instrument.”
A Longitudinal Study of Team Conflict, Conflict Management, Cohesion, and Team Effectiveness (2009, methodology): “We used a five-item scale adapted from Van der Vegt, Emans, and Van de Vliert (2001) and Chatman and Flynn (2001) to assess individual-level satisfaction with the team.”
A Longitudinal Examination of the Relationship Between Team Leadership and Performance (2010, methodology): “Cohesion promotes psychological attachment to the team and encourages members to work together to achieve desired outcomes (Chang & Bordia, 2001).”
Structural determinants of team performance: the mutual influences of learning culture, creativity, and knowledge (2010, background): “…based on a comprehensive literature review, other constructs such as leader-member-exchange (LMX) (Wayne, Shore, and Liden 1997), team cohesion (Chang and Bordia 2001), developmental feedback (Zhou 1998), and contextual work characteristics (Shalley, Zhou, and Oldham 2004) can be examined in…”
Organizational learning and entrepreneurship in family firms: exploring the moderating effect of ownership and cohesion (2012, methodology): “Items were based on the literature (e.g., Bollen and Hoyle 1990; Chang and Bordia 2001; LePine et al. 2008) and interviews with managers.”
Mapping 50 Years of Small Group Research Through Small Group Research (2020, background): “The articles in it indicate a focus on interdisciplinary collaboration and cohesion (e.g., Chang & Bordia, 2001; Evans & Dion, 1991; Stokes, 1983).”
Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan (2009, background): “However, Chang and Bordia (2001) indicated that some research disagrees with these metaanalyses regarding whether or not the cohesion–performance relationship is moderated by other variables, such as the level of analysis, task interdependency, goal acceptance, and team norm (Gully et al., 1995;…”
Effects of empowering leadership on performance in management team (2011, background): “Indeed, both task and social cohesion predicted positively all dimensions of group performance ( Chang and Bordia, 2001”
Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative Learning Environments (2006, methodology): “However, research following this study has showed that the relation is not always that consistent and has pointed out that social cohesion is potentially a predictor of team viability, another desirable outcome of teamwork (Chang & Bordia, 2001).”