Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis.

By M. Hammond, Nicole L. Neff, J. Farr, Alexander R. Schwall, Xinyuan Zhao. 2011

760 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f07db1958af6799caa104e728f0e73566a41d54a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Leading to Stimulate Employees' Ideas: A Quantitative Review of Leader–Member Exchange, Employee Voice, Creativity, and Innovative Behavior (2017, methodology): “Although we are aware of one prior study offering meta-analytic evidence about LMX and employee idea generation (Hammond et al., 2011), the present study is the first study that offers a comprehensive quantitative summary of the relationships between LMX and three important work outcomes: voice,…”
The role of multilevel synergistic interplay among team mastery climate, knowledge hiding, and job characteristics in stimulating innovative work behavior (2017, background): “Job control and decision-making authority have been also recognized as important ingredients for creativity (Amabile, 1996) and employee-driven innovation (Hammond et al., 2011).”
Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of leader creativity expectations (2015, background): “Furthermore, we answered the call originating from inconsistent results reported in meta-analytic research (Hammond et al., 2011; Rosing et al., 2011) to question the simplistic transformational leadership–follower creativity relationship in order to consider under what boundary conditions…”
Proactive Personality and Innovative Work Behavior: the Mediating Effects of Affective States and Creative Self-Efficacy in Teachers (2016, background): “As a result, a substantial number of studies have been performed to explore the antecedent variables that drive IWB in organizations (Chen et al. 2013; Hammond et al. 2011).”
Personal factors of creativity: A second order meta-analysis (2015, background): “The level of academic achievement was not significantly associated with innovation (Hammond et al., 2011, r = .14).”
On the Relation of Job Insecurity, Job Autonomy, Innovative Work Behaviour and the Mediating Effect of Work Engagement (2014, positive): “In studying the effect of job autonomy on IWB, we build upon the recent meta-analysis of Hammond et al. (2011), which identified job autonomy as one the main antecedents of employee innovative behaviour.”