On the Relation of Job Insecurity, Job Autonomy, Innovative Work Behaviour and the Mediating Effect of Work Engagement

By S. Spiegelaere, G. Gyes, Hans De Witte, W. Niesen, Geert van Hootegem. 2014

353 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f6310291b14b0370295cc084f839da28f321439

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Bahar Etehadi
2. Maximilian Orth
3. Judith Volmer
4. Osman M. Karatepe
5. Olusegun A. Olugbade

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Bahar Etehadi
2. Maximilian Orth
3. Judith Volmer
4. Osman M. Karatepe
5. A. Grobelna
6. Olusegun A. Olugbade
7. Xinyuan Zhao
8. Anastasia Ozturk

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Maximilian Orth
2. Judith Volmer
3. Osman M. Karatepe
4. A. Grobelna
5. Xinyuan Zhao
6. Olusegun A. Olugbade
7. Karthik Namasivayam
8. Sari Mansour

Citations in the corpus

• Daily within-person effects of job autonomy and work engagement on innovative behaviour: The cross-level moderating role of creative self-efficacy (2017, methodology): “In other words, the execution of new and useful ideas in one’s work environment inherently requires the situational latitude for breaking out of routines (Axtell et al., 2000; De Spiegelaere et al., 2014; Krause, 2004).”
• The impact of job insecurity on critical hotel employee outcomes: The mediating role of self-efficacy (2018, background): “De Spiegelaere, Van Gyes, De Witte, Niesen, and Van Hootegem (2014) showed that job insecurity negatively influenced Flemish service workers’ innovative behavior.”