UNDERSTANDING RESPONSES TO MULTI‐SOURCE FEEDBACK: THE ROLE OF CORE SELF‐EVALUATIONS

By J. Bono, Amy E. Colbert. 2005

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86e1ed253879d8378278339d7ea2abf5c095d902

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

High Core Self-Evaluators Maintain Creativity (2014, background): “They doubt their competence and capability, regarding themselves as powerless and blaming themselves for failures (Judge et al., 1997), focusing on weaknesses and negative thoughts about themselves, and suppressing strengths in the face of negative feedback (Bono & Colbert, 2005).”
A Self-Motives Perspective on Feedback-Seeking Behavior: Linking Organizational Behavior and Social Psychology Research (2007, background): “As a consequence, feedback reactions have been studied in assessment and development centers (Jones and Whitmore 1995), 360-degree feedback (Bono and Colbert 2005), management development programs (Ryan et al. 2000), computer testing (Tonidandel et al. 2002), performance appraisal (Cawley et al.…”
Personality and teamwork behavior in context: The cross‐level moderating role of collective efficacy (2011, background): “Studies have shown that individuals with a positive self-concept are more inclined to take active steps to improve their performance in response to negative feedback (e.g., Bandura & Cervone, 1983; Bono & Colbert, 2005), and perform better in the presence of social facilitation (e.g., Sanna, 1992).”
Linking core self-evaluation and emotional exhaustion with workplace loneliness: does high LMX make the consequence worse? (2019, background): “Besides, they are resilient (Bono & Colbert, 2005) and are generally satisfied with life (Judge et al., 2002).”
Core Self-Evaluations and Work Success (2009, background): “More recently, high scores on CSE have been linked to reduced stress and burnout (Best, Stapleton, & Downey, 2005), more constructivereactionstofeedback( Bono&Colbert,2005 ),more effective customer service (Salvaggio et al., 2007), heightened job-search persistence after unemployment (Wanberg, Glomb”
Core Self-Evaluations in Germany: Validation of a German Measure and its Relationships with Career Success (2010, background): “…and performance (Bono & Judge, 2003) as well as other vocational criteria such as health (Best, Stapleton, & Downey, 2005), responses to feedback (Bono & Colbert, 2005), customer service (Salvaggio, Schneider, Nishii, Mayer, Ramesh, & Lyon, 2007), and job search behavior (Wanberg, Glomb, Song, &…”
Implications of core self-evaluations for a changing organizational context (2011, background): “Specifically, core selfevaluations has been linked to proactive coping in response to stress (Kammeyer-Mueller et al., 2009), to entrepreneurial activity and risk taking (Simsek, Heavy, & Veiga, 2010), and to constructive responses to performance feedback (Bono & Colbert, 2005).”
Core Self-Evaluations (2012, methodology): “However, because of its association with self-appraisals and motivation (Bono & Colbert, 2005; Erez & Judge, 2001), CSE should have broad implications for various phases of the performance management process, including goal setting, coaching, and performance appraisal.”
The effects of core self‐evaluations and transformational leadership on organizational commitment (2012, background): “More recently, core self-evaluations have been found to be a significant predictor of a variety of outcomes including goal setting, goal commitment, stress and burnout, life satisfaction, happiness, job-search persistence, work and family satisfaction, commitment to change, creativity (Boyar and Mos”
Investigating the influences of core self‐evaluations, job autonomy, and intrinsic motivation on in‐role job performance (2010, background): “…that a positive relationship between core self-evaluations and motivation in employees’ self-concepts may affect their decisions to engage in and perform their job activities (Bono & Colbert, 2005; Erez & Judge, 2001; Hiller & Hambrick, 2005; Piccolo, Judge, Takahashi, Watanabe, & Locke, 2005).”