Chu-Hsiang (Daisy) Chang

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management · 2006–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 71 researchers and is trusted by 21 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Chu-Hsiang (Daisy) Chang trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Jose M. Cortina
  2. T. Judge
  3. J. Bono
  4. Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben
  5. Paul E. Spector
  6. Edward L. Deci
  7. Jeffrey LePine
  8. Denise M. Rousseau
  9. Richard M. Ryan
  10. A. Elliot

Who trusts Chu-Hsiang (Daisy) Chang overall

  1. Tariq Iqbal Khan
  2. Russell E. Johnson
  3. Galit Meisler
  4. O. Epitropaki
  5. Christopher C. Rosen
  6. Allison S. Gabriel
  7. R. Lord
  8. S. Aryee
  9. Dirk De Clercq
  10. Ryan Fehr

Papers from Chu-Hsiang (Daisy) Chang's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Chu-Hsiang (Daisy) Chang trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. (American Psychologist)
  2. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
  3. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  4. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  5. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  6. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  7. The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior
  8. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.
  9. Inequity In Social Exchange
  10. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. (Annual Review of Psychology)

Their papers