LEARNING FROM ACADEMIA: THE IMPORTANCE OF RELATIONSHIPS IN PROFESSIONAL LIFE
By C. Gersick, Jane E. Dutton, Jean M. Bartunek. 2000
478 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Gender Studies, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02b3cc4089d8bb37f99c55483492e1eaeed4470a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- T. Judge
- Wendy C. Marcinkus
- B. Caza
- Karen S. Whelan-Berry
- Nicole M. Gillespie
- Blake E. Ashforth
- Judith R. Gordon
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
In Gender Studies
- Peter A. Bamberger
- David M. Sluss
- B. Caza
- T. Judge
- Dean Tjosvold
- L. Barron
- Nicole M. Gillespie
- Daewoo Park
In Social Psychology
- S. Hannah
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Radostina K. Purvanova
- D. Vîrgă
- J. Schaubroeck
- C. Sulea
- Arnold B. Bakker
- L. Maricuţoiu
Citations in the corpus
- Relational and Identity Perspectives on Healthy Versus Unhealthy Pursuit of Callings (2012, background): “These types of relationships are important to one’s well-being because they provide the resources and support needed to buffer or recover from negative or difficult situations and events (Gersick et al., 2000).”
- Exploring the Social Ledger: Negative Relationships and Negative Asymmetry in Social Networks in Organizations (2006, background): “Recent research (e.g., Baldwin, et al., 1997; Gersick, et al., 2000; Labianca, et al., 1998) found that negative relationships are indeed rare and unexpected, involving only 1-8% of the possible relationships in a network.”
- Organizational Influences, Public Service Motivation and Work Outcomes: An Australian Study (2008, background): “A pleasant work relationship with management and co-workers is likely to enhance the employees’ positive perceptions of their work, notably that it is important and meaningful (Bradbury and Lichtenstein 2000; Gersick et al. 2000; Kahn 1998).”
- Developing trust with peers and leaders: Impacts on organizational identification and performance during entry (2013, background): “Women are seen to differ from men in the relationship dynamics they encounter in organizational life (Gersick et al., 2000), and thus the gender homogeneity of this research context should be borne in mind in interpreting the findings.”
- Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model (2008, background): “For individuals, relationships can be instrumental to achieving rewards, such as upward mobility (Podolny & Baron, 1997), or can even be considered ends in themselves, because colleagues affect a person’s day-to-day enjoyment at work (Gersick et al., 2000).”
- A few good women—on top management teams (2005, background): “Fourth, women are more likely to adopt a blearningQ approach with their networking strategies; they are more likely to seek ties with not just others inside the organization but are also likely to seek extraorganizational relationships with other women so that they are better equipped to overcome ge”
- Best-Practice Recommendations for Producers, Evaluators, and Users of Methodological Literature Reviews (2020, unknown): “This approach, in which discoveries from the data are repeatedly compared to and integrated into an emergent model, is useful for knowledge generation when examining novel or relatively less well-understood phenomena (Gersick et al., 2000; Locke, 2001).”
- Gender differences in burnout: A meta-analysis (2010, background): “prove oneself, of being expected to fail, and of being treated as a representative of their gender rather than as an individual (e.g., AlbanMetclafe &West, 1991; Gersick et al., 2000; Kanter, 1977; Rosin & Korabik, 1991).”