DEFINING AND MEASURING SERVANT LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOUR IN ORGANIZATIONS

By Sen Sendjaya, J. Sarros, Joseph C. Santora. 2008

677 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84d311076c7e2f127aa0b0fefa965301790df877

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Information Systems and Management

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

The relationship between servant leadership, organisational citizenship behaviour and team effectiveness (2014, background): “Servant leadership is regarded as virtuous, highly ethical and based on the premise that service to followers is at the core of leadership (Sendjaya et al., 2008).”
Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation? A multi-level mediation study of identification and prototypicality (2014, background): “…to develop followers), intentions (e.g., willingness to sacrifice for others), and values (e.g., employing ethically justifiablemeans) generate followers' respect and loyalty (Liden et al., 2008; Neubert et al., 2008; Sendjaya et al., 2008; van Dierendonck, 2011; Walumbwa, Hartnell, & Oke, 2010).”
Theoretical Development and Empirical Examination of a Three-Roles Model of Responsible Leadership (2019, neutral): “There is also some overlap with servant leadership, which includes the notion of stewardship as part of the servant leadership construct (Sendjaya et al. 2008; van Dierendonck and Nuijten 2011).”
Using multi-item psychometric scales for research and practice in human resource management (2018, background): “Often, at this stage, the items are reviewed by a panel of experts, such as those consulted by Sendjaya, Sarros, and Santora (2008) when developing their scales measuring servant leadership.”
The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure (2010, background): “A few years ago, Sendjaya et al. (2008) introduced an instrument consisting of 35 items representing 22 characteristics divided over six scales.”
Relationship between innovation‐led HR policy, strategy, and firm performance: A serial mediation investigation (2018, background): “…to develop followers), intentions (e.g., willingness to sacrifice for others), and values (e.g., employing ethically justifiable means) generate followers’ respect and loyalty (Liden et al., 2008; Neubert et al., 2008; Sendjaya et al., 2008; van Dierendonck, 2011; Walumbwa, Hartnell, & Oke, 2010).”
How Servant Leadership Influences Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Roles of LMX, Empowerment, and Proactive Personality (2017, background): “…leadership has been measured in numerous ways in prior empirical research (Barbuto and Wheeler, 2006; Ehrhart 2004; Laub 1999; Liden et al. 2008; Sendjaya et al. 2008), and there is no overall consensus regarding the exact behaviors that constitute servant leadership (Parris and Welty Peachey…”
A Systematic Literature Review of Servant Leadership Theory in Organizational Contexts (2012, methodology): “Han et al. (2010) used multiple dimensions and deﬁnitions of servant leadership in Western literature including but not limited to: Barbuto and Wheeler (2006); Liden et al. (2008); Ehrhart (2004); and Sendjaya et al. (2008).”
Examination of the Relationships Between Servant Leadership, Organizational Commitment, and Voice and Antisocial Behaviors (2015, background): “Several scales of servant leadership are available in the literature (e.g., Ehrhart 2004; Liden et al. 2008, 2015; Sendjaya et al. 2008; van Dierendonck and Nuijten 2011).”
Servant Leadership Behaviour Scale: A hierarchical model and test of construct validity (2011, methodology): “Several servant leadership constructs have been developed, but in this study we chose to examine the servant leadership behaviour model developed by Sendjaya et al. (2008), as previous work suggested that this construct represents a more all-encompassing model of servant leadership in comparison to…”