Transformational leadership and team performance
By Shelley D. Dionne, Francis J. Yammarino, Leanne Atwater, W. D. Spangler. 2004
683 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/281735d72590ff9e55717357bc6c5e7379737912
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- D. van Knippenberg
- Heike Bruch
- Jens Rowold
- Michael S. Cole
- N. Lehmann‐Willenbrock
- Boas Shamir
- Annika Luisa Meinecke
- Simone Kauffeld
In Social Psychology
- Heike Bruch
- D. van Knippenberg
- Jens Rowold
- Michael S. Cole
- Peter J. C. Sleegers
- N. Lehmann‐Willenbrock
- Annika Luisa Meinecke
- T. Peetsma
In Sociology and Political Science
- Heike Bruch
- D. van Knippenberg
- Michael S. Cole
- L. Tost
- Richard P. Larrick
- Rebecca Mitchell
- N. Lehmann‐Willenbrock
- Boas Shamir
Citations in the corpus
- Person-Organization Value Congruence: How Transformational Leaders Influence Work Group Effectiveness (2011, background): “…self-confidence and deep personal concern for the well-being of his or her employees is likely to engender a strong sense of pride, commitment (Dionne et al., 2004), and desire among followers to emulate the leader’s attitude and behavior, fostering the perception that their personal values…”
- When Power Makes Others Speechless: The Negative Impact of Leader Power on Team Performance (2013, background): “Furthermore, since open communication is critical to team effectiveness (Dionne et al., 2004; Gardner et al., 2012; Guzzo & Dickson, 1996), we expect that the negative effect of a formal leader’s subjective experience of power on team communication in turn produces a negative effect on team performa”
- Transformational leadership, employee engagement and performance: Mediating effect of psychological ownership (2011, background): “Intellectual stimulation is defined as the ability of an individual to be logical, rational and able to intelligently adopt from certain situations (Dionne et al., 2003).”
- A Process-Based Explanation of the Psychic Distance Paradox: Evidence from Global Virtual Teams (2014, background): “It has been argued that an understanding of team performance as a teamwork process allows the exploration of theoretical linkages on an interpersonal level (Dionne et al. 2004).”
- Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention (2018, neutral): “Leadership styles are viewed as an UL construct as leaders command a top-down in fl uence on employees (Dionne et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2013).”
- Linking Transformational Leadership and Team Performance: A Conflict Management Approach (2011, neutral): “found to have especially powerful effects on team performance (DeGroot et al., 2000; Dionne et al., 2004).”
- Social distance as a moderator of the effects of transformational leadership: Both neutralizer and enhancer (2009, background): “This leadership style refers to the behavioral idealized influence dimension and the inspirational motivation dimension (Kark & Shamir, 2002; Walter & Bruch, 2007), reflecting such behaviors as talking about the importance of values, beliefs, and purpose, promoting confidence in the achievement of g”
- How transformational leadership works during team interactions: A behavioral process analysis (2015, background): “…generate solutions to identified problems, developing strategies and creating commitment toward implementing those solutions, and by conveying a vision for improving the team's collaboration and performance outcomes (Dionne et al., 2004; Morgeson, DeRue, & Karam, 2010; Zaccaro et al., 2001).”