Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK)

By Charoula Angeli, Nicos Valanides. Comput. Educ., 2009

1,291 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c75949827bb5258a8c9cc1fa408db18e2c9f849

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

In Media Technology

Citations in the corpus

A K-6 Computational Thinking Curriculum Framework: Implications for Teacher Knowledge (2016, methodology): “From this perspective, the introduction of Technology Knowledge in the existing framework of PCK successfully expanded PCK to TPCK - that is, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Angeli & Valanides, 2005; Angeli & Valanides, 2009; Koehler & Mishra, 2008; Niess, 2005).”
Teachers’ online teaching expectations and experiences during the Covid19-pandemic in the Netherlands (2020, background): “Most teachers nowadays are digital literate, but it is still important to learn how ICT can be used effectively and meaningfully in the classroom (Angeli and Valanides 2009; Ertmer and Ottenbreit-Leftwicht 2010).”
Facilitating Preservice Teachers' Development of Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) (2010, background): “This integrated form of contextualized knowledge has been recently referred to as the TPACK (Mishra & Khoeler, 2006; Thompson & Mishra, 2007) or other similar notion such as ICT related TPACK (Angeli & Valanides, 2005; 2009).”
The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework (2014, methodology): “A more sophisticated example of the TPK to TPACK pathway is an approach called Technology Mapping (Angeli and Valanides, 2009 ) .”
Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey (2010, background): “A common way of TPACK evaluation was to study teachers’ learning behaviours and learning products throughout their attendance of ICT courses (e.g. Niess 2005; Koehler et al. 2007; Angeli & Valanides 2009).”
A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relationship Between Epistemic Cognition and Academic Achievement (2018, background): “An additional 105 studies were excluded because we determined they were focused on something other than epistemic cognition (e.g., Angeli & Valanides, 2009; Gupta, 2008).”
TPACK Development in Science Teaching: Measuring the TPACK Confidence of Inservice Science Teachers (2009, methodology): “Some researchers have started with the idea of technology-enhanced PCK in science and moved towards using TPACK as an organizing framework for their research (Angeli, 2004; Angeli & Valanides, 2009; Valanides & Angel, 2005).”
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) (2009, background): “Angeli and Valanides (2009) have explored the use of design-based performance assessments embedded into course sequences.”
Teacher involvement in curriculum design: need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertise (2014, background): “…keeping the subject matter knowledge up-to-date, teacher designers have to become familiar with the difficulties learners have regarding the subject matter knowledge and why learners experience these difficulties (Angeli and Valanides 2009, Kreber and Cranton 2000, Marks 1990, Richey et al. 2004).”
A Review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (2013, background): “…teachers and students' perception of the pedagogical use of simulation for learning chemistry Allan, Erickson, Brookhouse, & Johnson, 2010; Angeli & Valanides, 2009; Doering, Veletsianos, Scharber, & Miller, 2009; Hardy, 2010a, 2010b; Koehler & Mishra, 2005; Mishra & Koehler, 2006;…”
Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a path model (2010, background): “figure out the affordance of the technology and how particular software might be beneficial to student learning ( Angeli and Valanides 2009; Newhouse and Rennie 2001; Snoeyink and Ertmer 2002).”