The Effect Of Individual Perceptions of Deadlines on Team Performance

By Mary J. Waller, Jeffrey M. Conte, Cristina B. Gibson, Mason A. Carpenter. 2001

271 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0bb8d166af331880d6bbe741c7b4fe1255416822

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Technology-assisted supplemental work and work-to-family conflict: The role of instrumentality beliefs, organizational expectations and time management (2010, background): “…to overestimate the passage of time, schedule numerous objectives to be achieved within a specific time period, engage in self-set deadlines (although they are sensitive to external deadline cues as well), and consistently monitor time usage (Rastegary and Landy, 1993; Waller et al., 2001).”
The “Other” Time: A Review of the Subjective Experience of Time in Organizations (2020, methodology): “As another example, Waller et al. (2001) theorized that individuals’ attention to the future increases awareness of deadlines, spurring more planning when future deadlines are salient.”
When is an Hour Not 60 Minutes? Deadlines, Temporal Schemata, and Individual and Task Group Performance (2005, background): “For example, understanding possible group composition effects stemming from group members having different time orientations (Waller et al., 2001) to see if they affect the tempo ral atypicality phenomenon found in this study would be an interesting future research path.”
Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus : the subjective experience of the past, present, and future (2009, background): “If an individual’s temporal focus profile is not compatible with that of the group or organization, conflicts and misunderstandings could arise, leading to dissatisfaction, decreased performance, and turnover (Bluedorn & Denhardt, 1988; Waller et al., 2001).”
Time in Individual-Level Organizational Studies: What is it, How is it Used, and Why Isn't it Exploited More Often? (2015, background): “…issue of Academy of Management Review was published (Goodman et al. 2001) in which articles addressed the conceptualization of time (Ancona et al. 2001b), timing changes (Blount& Janicik 2001), deadlines (Waller et al. 2001), and temporal issues in methodology (Mitchell & James 2001), among others.”
The Negotiation Dance: Time, Culture, and Behavioral Sequences in Negotiation (2005, background): “processes (Waller et al. 2001).”
Multiple Team Membership: a Theoretical Model of its Effects on Productivity and Learning for Individuals and Teams (2011, background): “In this sense, the mechanism by which multiple team memberships increase team productivity is analogous to the one that increases individual productivity, but it is manifested in terms of team members’ collective consciousness about the time pressures facing them (Waller et al., 2001) and teams’ col”
Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams (2003, background): “For example, since team member’s perceptions of deadlines affect subsequent behaviors, understanding differences in perceptions may provide further insights into understanding performance under deadline conditions [58, 59].”