Time in Individual-Level Organizational Studies: What is it, How is it Used, and Why Isn't it Exploited More Often?

By Abbie J. Shipp, Michael S. Cole. 2015

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3c353e95404582e12b4d0b912f09637fa172f768

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Am I a Leader? Examining Leader Identity Development Over Time (2017, background): “Because leader development represents a dynamic phenomenon, within-person research based on repeated measures offers the potential to greatly advance our understanding of the processes that underlie leader development (Shipp & Cole, 2015).”
Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences (2018, background): “As part of a broader, albeit overdue, trend in the literature (Shipp & Cole 2015), scholars have been increasingly exploring how the dynamics of resources in COR theory depend upon time.”
The “Other” Time: A Review of the Subjective Experience of Time in Organizations (2020, background): “This tension echoes earlier concerns about a divide between “research on time” versus “time-related research” (Lee and Liebenau, 1999, p. 1035), or “time as a focal construct” versus “time as a medium for change” (Shipp & Cole, 2015, p. 239).”
Scientific Contributions of Within-Person Research in Management: Making the Juice Worth the Squeeze (2018, background): “In within-person research, time is primarily viewed as an underlying basis for change (Shipp & Cole, 2015).”
Leadership Process Models: A Review and Synthesis (2017, methodology): “Drawing on Mitchell and James (2001), we apply four such configurations, which can serve as a foundation for a theory-based treatment of time in leadership process research (Ancona, Goodman, Lawrence, & Tushman, 2001; Shipp & Cole, 2015).”
Play at Work: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research (2018, background): “Recently, organizational scholars have suggested that understanding when things take place is crucial to making sense of organizational phenomena (Mitchell & James, 2001; Shipp & Cole, 2015; Sonnentag, 2012).”
Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends and Considerations for Scholarly Advancement (2018, background): “First, trends and cycles could reflect interesting and important processes directly related to theories being examined in the ESM study (Shipp & Cole, 2015).”
Examining the “I” in Team: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Influence of Team Narcissism Composition on Team Outcomes in the NBA (2020, background): “In addition, we contributed to the growing literature that examines time and its effects on organizational phenomena (e.g., Shipp & Cole, 2015).”
The Space Between Us: A Social-Functional Emotions View of Ambivalent and Indifferent Workplace Relationships (2017, background): “Whereas time is the medium through which relationships evolve and change (Shipp & Cole, 2015), it has not yet systematically been integrated into relationships research.”