Work Engagement and its Relationship with State and Trait Trust: A Conceptual Analysis
By A. Chughtai, Finian Buckley. 2008
171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/004fa408cbdd37f7b557e3b1375d57bb4a54954d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- B. Shuck
- Cornelia Venter
- Karolina Łaba
- Madelyn Geldenhuys
- Chieh-Peng Lin
- Ike E. Onyishi
- Upasna A. Agarwal
- F. Ugwu
In Human Factors and Ergonomics
- B. Shuck
- Chieh-Peng Lin
- Ike E. Onyishi
- Upasna A. Agarwal
- F. Ugwu
- Kim F. Nimon
- Kobena Osam
- Drea Zigarmi
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- Inclusive Leadership and Work Engagement: Mediating Roles of Affective Organizational Commitment and Creativity (2015, unknown): “Our findings are also congruent with those of Saks (2006) and Chughtai and Buckley (2008), indicating that leaders’ behaviors have significant effects on the level of employee work engagement.”
- Examining the Relationship Between Supervisor and Management Trust and Job Burnout Among Correctional Staff (2012, background): “Employee trust has two dimensions, supervisor trust and management trust (Chughtai & Buckley, 2008; Masterson, Lewis, Goldman, & Taylor, 2000).”
- Definitional and Conceptual Muddling: Identifying the Positionality of Employee Engagement and Defining the Construct (2017, methodology): “Using work engagement as an example, prior to the landmark article by Bakker et al. (2008), there remained confusion in the literature about how to conceptualize work engagement (i.e., opposite of burnout or as a separate framework on its own; Chughtai & Buckley, 2008).”
- Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement (2014, background): “However, these factors have not been sufficiently considered in recent employee engagement conceptualisations (Bakker et al., 2008; Chughtai and Buckley, 2008).”
- Meaningful work, work engagement and organisational commitment (2014, background): “Drawing attention to the physical component of work engagement, which is vigour, Chughtai and Buckley (2008) postulate that higher levels of vigour suggest an individual’s increased readiness to devote effort within their work by not becoming easily fatigued, and developing the tendency to remain re”
- Linking organizational trust with employee engagement: the role of psychological empowerment (2014, methodology): “In this study weempirically investigated the relationship between organizational trust, psychological empowerment and work engagement by filling the research gap, as suggested by Chughtai and Buckley (2008).”
- Modeling Corporate Citizenship, Organizational Trust, and Work Engagement Based on Attachment Theory (2010, background): “Second, dedication refers to a strong identification with their work and encompasses feelings of enthusiasm, inspiration, pride, and challenge (Chughtai and Buckley, 2008).”
- Influence of Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior in Sustainable Organizations: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes (2019, background): “The existing literature supported the positive influence of trust in the leader on employees’ work engagement [90,93,94].”
- Authentic leadership, trust and work engagement (2011, background): “This study posits that the relationship between trust and work engagement is mutually reinforcing and leads to an upward spiral effect [14].”