Joseph D. Novak

Developmental and Educational Psychology · 1998–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 20 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 12 citations into it; #997 of 8,223 by trust here, #2,393 by citations
• Education — 9 citations into it; #981 of 11,309 by trust here, #2,243 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 5 citations into it

Whom Joseph D. Novak trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Alberto J. Cañas
2. Richard E. Mayer
3. Paul A. Kirschner
4. J. Mintzes
5. Andrea A. diSessa
6. David Turner
7. T. Kuhn
8. John Sweller
9. Michelene T. H. Chi
10. John Seely Brown

Who trusts Joseph D. Novak overall

1. Alberto J. Cañas
2. Andreani Baytelman
3. William Winn
4. Susan Gomez-Zwiep
5. Cory A. Buxton
6. Ian M. Kinchin
7. Cynthia Grant
8. David B. Hay
9. Ron Ritchhart
10. Kalypso Iordanou

Papers from Joseph D. Novak's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Joseph D. Novak trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Learning creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools
2. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. (American Psychologist)
3. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching
4. The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.
5. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
6. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. 1956.
7. Thought and language.
8. On the Validity of Cognitive Interpretations of Scores From Alternative Concept-Mapping Techniques
9. CmapTools: A Knowledge Modeling and Sharing Environment
10. Assessing science understanding : a human constructivist view

Their papers

• A TEORIA SUBJACENTE AOS MAPAS CONCEITUAIS E COMO ELABORÁ-LOS E USÁ-LOS * THE THEORY UNDERLYING CONCEPT MAPS AND HOW TO CONSTRUCT AND USE THEM (2010) — 851 citations
• Freedom vs. Restriction of Content and Structure during Concept Mapping - Possibilities and Limitations for Construction and Assessment (2012) — 64 citations
• Applied Concept Mapping: Capturing, Analyzing, and Organizing Knowledge (2011) — 162 citations
• Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge (2009) — 403 citations
• The Origins of the Concept Mapping Tool and the Continuing Evolution of the Tool* (2006) — 432 citations
• Results and Implications of a 12-Year Longitudinal Study of Science Concept Learning (2005) — 123 citations
• Assessing science understanding : a human constructivist view (2005) — 285 citations
• The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How To Construct Them (2004) — 1,353 citations
• Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners (2002) — 957 citations
• Learning creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools (1998)