The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

By D. Shapere. 1964

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

The hardware lottery (2020, background): “Intellectual traditions and available tooling can prejudice scientists against certain ideas and towards others (Kuhn, 1962).”
Simple Forecasts and Paradigm Shifts (2007, methodology): “4 Our rendition of the learning process is inspired in part by Thomas Kuhn’s (1962) classic, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Kuhn argues that scientific observation and reasoning is shaped by simplified models, which he refers to as paradigms. During the course of what Kuhn refers to as “no”
Counseling for Work and RelationshipΨ (2012, background): “Kuhn (1962) defined a paradigm as a set of interwoven assumptions and beliefs shared by a scientific community that underlies and sets the agenda for current research.”
Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education (2004, unknown): “Change in the history of science has been likened to a sequence of revolutions called “paradigm shifts” by the noted historian of science, Thomas Kuhn. (Kuhn, 1970; p. viii see also Efland, Freedman, & Stuhr, 1996).1 Heretofore, progress in science was pictured as an uphill march toward enlightenmen”
Death and Black Diamonds: Meaning, Mortality, and the Meaning Maintenance Model (2006, background): “Curiously, many of Bruner and Postman's (1949) participants were said to experience “acute personal distress” ( Kuhn, 1962/1996 , p.”
Paradigms in turbulent combustion research (2005, background): “Thomas Kuhn argues [28] that the most interesting aspects of scientific enquiry are the paradigm shifts and the events causing them, which may be experimental, theoretical or sociological.”
The Meaning of Meaning (2007, unknown): “Figure 5 also presents a cognitive stage transition (Piaget, 1977), an epiphany, an awakening, and a paradigmatic revolution, in a somewhat broader sense than that originally meant by Kuhn (1970) (Peterson, 1999a).”
Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review (2017, methodology): “A meta-narrative, following the work of Kuhn (1970) on research paradigms and diffusion of innovations, distinguishes itself as a synthesis method by identifying the research traditions relevant to the research question and included studies (Greenhalgh et al. 2005).”
On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education (2005, background): “It may not be immediately apparent where these theories overlap and where they conflict, and indeed, these questions may not be meaningful, in that the enquiries might be incommensurable (Kuhn, 1962).”
Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. (2007, background): “…of research traditionally have highly fertile periods, followed by the accumulation of unsolved problems that require changes to the traditional perspective or the introduction of a radically new perspective in order to advance and spur new research (Bechtel, 1988; Kuhn, 1970; Laudan, 1977).”
Critical review on biofilm methods (2017, methodology): “To compare biofilm images, a quantitative measurement of the images, preferentially followed by statistical analysis, can remove the unintentional possibly biased interpretation of the researcher (Kuhn, 1970).”
How Learning about Scientists' Struggles Influences Students' Interest and Learning in Physics (2012, background): “These efforts are undoubtedly important for science education, as textbooks constitute a major source of science learning (Kuhn, 1970; Memory & Uhlhorn, 1991); it is more difficult to motivate students to study uninteresting science texts (Holliday, 2002).”
Thinking about Creativity in Science Education (2012, unknown): “(Kuhn, 1970: p. 156).”
A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship (2012, unknown): “In contrast to this inclusive approach, I argue that, at such a pre-paradigm stage of development (Kuhn 1962), the field is better served if knowledge about social entrepreneurship is developed though the elaboration of sharper, well-bounded theories that compete for attention and validation…”
Scientific Progress in Strategic Management: The Case of the Resource-Based View (2007, unknown): “And it failed on Kuhnian criteria (Kuhn 1970), as it did not lead to the complete overthrow of previous strategic management perspectives.”