The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How To Construct Them

By Joseph D. Novak. 2004

1,353 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c675296cb0b6ef1b9b11a6b5bd67c87feda402aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job (2018, background): “These labels allow one to logically define the structure (Novak and Cañas, 2008).”
RICOSRE: A Learning Model to Develop Critical Thinking Skills for Students with Different Academic Abilities (2019, background): “During the training, students should be taught how to create meaningful links among concepts in a proportional form and how to find a relationship between knowledge and practice (Novak & Canas, 2006).”
The Origins of the Concept Mapping Tool and the Continuing Evolution of the Tool* (2006, background): “Information Visualization publishes papers describing a much broader range of information visualizations techniques, some of which are very different from concept maps that deal primarily with concept and propositional knowledge (see Novak & Cañas [9] for further information on the Theory Underlying”
Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for Your "House". (2016, methodology): “Concept mapping is a process for representing and organizing ideas using pictures (Novak & Cañas, 2006).”
Universities as centres of non-learning (2008, background): “This in turn provides the theoretical foundations for concept mapping techniques (Novak 1998 ; Novak and Canas 2006 ), both drawing heavily from Ausubel’s assimilation theory of learning (Ausubel 2000 ).”
Using Concept Mapping to Enhance the Research Interview (2010, methodology): “Following Novak and Cañas (2006), we define concept as a perceived regularity in events or objects, or records of events or objects, and propositions as statements about some object or event in the universe, either naturally occurring or constructed.”
Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter? (2011, background): “The map normally begins with a word or concept or phrase which represents a focus question that requires an answer (Novak and Cañas 2006).”