Assessing science understanding : a human constructivist view
By J. Mintzes, J. Wandersee, Joseph D. Novak. 2005
285 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/178fe7a66cb17629bf065c49d6e153b9e8b2fc32
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Ian M. Kinchin
- Alberto J. Cañas
- David B. Hay
- Joseph D. Novak
- Simon Lygo-Baker
- Susan Gomez-Zwiep
- L. Cabot
- Ana Amélia Amorim Carvalho
Citations in the corpus
- A TEORIA SUBJACENTE AOS MAPAS CONCEITUAIS E COMO ELABORÁ-LOS E USÁ-LOS * THE THEORY UNDERLYING CONCEPT MAPS AND HOW TO CONSTRUCT AND USE THEM (2010, background): “One of the powerful uses of concept maps is not only as a learning tool but also as an evaluation tool, thus encouraging students to use meaningful-mode learning patterns (Mintzes et al., 2000; Novak, 1990; Novak & Gowin, 1984).”
- The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How To Construct Them (2004, background): “Other innovative practices for assessing student understanding of subject matter are also available (Mintzes et al., 2000).”
- Improving the usefulness of concept maps as a research tool for science education (2004, background): “Since then, a substantial bibliography related to concept maps has been assembled (Novak 1990, White and Gunstone 1992, Wandersee et al. 1994, Mintzes et al. 2000), offering ample information about their usefulness as instructional tools (Trowbridge and Wandersee 1994) and learning tools in…”
- The evolution of a collaborative concept mapping activity for undergraduate microbiology students (2005, background): “The range of applications for concept mapping in teaching and assessment in biology have been reviewed by Kinchin (2000) and Edmondson (2000) and so will not be elaborated here.”