Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos

Education · 2007–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 30 researchers and is trusted by 13 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Education — 72 citations into it; #1,572 of 11,309 by trust here, #2,617 by citations
• Theoretical Computer Science — 33 citations into it; #66 of 253 by trust here, #73 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 31 citations into it; #4,069 of 12,932 by trust here, #5,126 by citations
• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 18 citations into it; #1,766 of 8,223 by trust here, #2,679 by citations
• Mathematical Physics — 11 citations into it
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 8 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 6 citations into it

Whom Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Keith Weber
2. Matthew Inglis
3. Annie Selden
4. J. Selden
5. Samuel D. Gosling
6. Lara Alcock
7. M. Rodd
8. Andreas J. Stylianides
9. Lulu Healy
10. G. Hanna

Who trusts Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos overall

1. Keith Weber
2. Matthew Inglis
3. Lara Alcock
4. K. Lew
5. M. Hodds
6. F. Arzarello
7. Elena Nardi
8. Timothy Fukawa-Connelly
9. Bettina Pedemonte
10. Renée S. Cole

Papers from Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. A Study of Proof Conceptions in Algebra
2. Making Believe: The Collective Construction of Public Mathematical Knowledge in the Elementary Classroom
3. Modelling mathematical argumentation: the importance of qualification
4. How Mathematicians Determine if an Argument Is a Valid Proof
5. Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge
6. Mathematics Majors' Perceptions of Conviction, Validity, and Proof
7. Establishing a custom of proving in american school geometry: evolution of the two-column proof in the early twentieth century
8. Why and how mathematicians read proofs: an exploratory study
9. The Effect of Authority on the Persuasiveness of Mathematical Arguments
10. Dimensionality and Disciplinary Differences in Personal Epistemology. (Contemporary Educational Psychology)

Their papers

• Why and how mathematicians read proofs: an exploratory study (2011) — 115 citations
• The Effect of Authority on the Persuasiveness of Mathematical Arguments (2009) — 104 citations
• An assessment model for proof comprehension in undergraduate mathematics (2011) — 159 citations
• Why and how mathematicians read proofs: further evidence from a survey study (2014) — 62 citations
• Lectures in Advanced Mathematics: Why Students Might Not Understand What the Mathematics Professor Is Trying to Convey. (2016) — 87 citations
• How Mathematicians Obtain Conviction: Implications for Mathematics Instruction and Research on Epistemic Cognition (2014) — 88 citations
• Modelling mathematical argumentation: the importance of qualification (2007) — 261 citations