Matthew Inglis

Education · 2007–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 13 papers; trusts 52 researchers and is trusted by 13 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Education — 117 citations into it; #1,585 of 11,309 by trust here, #2,921 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 82 citations into it; #4,161 of 12,932 by trust here, #5,294 by citations
• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 42 citations into it; #1,595 of 8,223 by trust here, #2,679 by citations
• Theoretical Computer Science — 34 citations into it
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 28 citations into it; #5,078 of 9,731 by trust here, #8,664 by citations
• Artificial Intelligence — 13 citations into it
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 11 citations into it
• Clinical Psychology — 8 citations into it

Whom Matthew Inglis trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Keith Weber
2. Annie Selden
3. Keith Rayner
4. Terence Tao
5. A. Pollitt
6. Andreas J. Stylianides
7. Shaaron E. Ainsworth
8. M. Rodd
9. J. Selden
10. Lulu Healy

Who trusts Matthew Inglis overall

1. Keith Weber
2. Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos
3. F. Arzarello
4. Elena Nardi
5. Lara Alcock
6. Bettina Pedemonte
7. Renée S. Cole
8. Todd D. Cadwalladerolsker
9. Jennifer M. Langer-Osuna
10. C. Sabena

Papers from Matthew Inglis's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Matthew Inglis trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. A Study of Proof Conceptions in Algebra
2. Making Believe: The Collective Construction of Public Mathematical Knowledge in the Elementary Classroom
3. Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge
4. How Mathematicians Determine if an Argument Is a Valid Proof
5. Establishing a custom of proving in american school geometry: evolution of the two-column proof in the early twentieth century
6. Mathematics Majors' Perceptions of Conviction, Validity, and Proof
7. Modelling mathematical argumentation: the importance of qualification
8. Dimensionality and Disciplinary Differences in Personal Epistemology. (Contemporary Educational Psychology)
9. The Effect of Authority on the Persuasiveness of Mathematical Arguments
10. Improving Students' Ability to Identify and Use Source Information

Their papers

• The Effect of Authority on the Persuasiveness of Mathematical Arguments (2009) — 104 citations
• Spontaneous focusing on numerosity and the arithmetic advantage (2015) — 79 citations
• Expert and Novice Approaches to Reading Mathematical Proofs (2012) — 78 citations
• Rigorous Large-Scale Educational RCTs Are Often Uninformative: Should We Be Concerned? (2019) — 154 citations
• An Introduction to Mathematical Cognition (2018) — 60 citations
• Measuring Conceptual Understanding Using Comparative Judgement (2016) — 69 citations
• Inhibitory control in mathematical thinking, learning and problem solving: a survey (2015) — 51 citations
• Beauty Is Not Simplicity: An Analysis of Mathematicians' Proof Appraisals (2015) — 89 citations
• The problem of assessing problem solving: can comparative judgement help? (2015) — 77 citations
• How Mathematicians Obtain Conviction: Implications for Mathematics Instruction and Research on Epistemic Cognition (2014) — 88 citations
• Self-explanation training improves proof comprehension (2014) — 148 citations
• Doctoral students’ use of examples in evaluating and proving conjectures (2008) — 95 citations
• Modelling mathematical argumentation: the importance of qualification (2007) — 261 citations