U. Knoch
Language and Linguistics · 2007–2014
A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 46 researchers and is trusted by 29 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Language and Linguistics — 82 citations into it; #149 of 3,093 by trust here, #110 by citations
- Literature and Literary Theory — 66 citations into it; #126 of 2,496 by trust here, #152 by citations
- Education — 39 citations into it; #627 of 11,309 by trust here, #1,234 by citations
- Developmental and Educational Psychology — 35 citations into it; #1,037 of 8,223 by trust here, #2,079 by citations
- Management Science and Operations Research — 6 citations into it
Whom U. Knoch trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Averil Coxhead
- Glenn Fulcher
- Alister H Cumming
- J. Alderson
- D. Ferris
- J. Bitchener
- R. Ellis
- L. Ortega
- Robert N. Kantor
- Fangyuan Yuan
Who trusts U. Knoch overall
- K. Karim
- C. V. Beuningen
- E. Kang
- D. Ferris
- F. Kuiken
- Hossein Nassaji
- Icy Lee
- Susan D. Benson
- J. Bitchener
- S. Youn
Papers from U. Knoch's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers U. Knoch trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners´ Acquisition of Articles.
- ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE?
- THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS KINDS OF ERROR FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE ACCURACY AND FLUENCY OF L2 STUDENT WRITING
- The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing.
- Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: The Interface between Learning and Assessment
- Response To Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students
- Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?
- The Effects of Pre‐Task Planning and On‐Line Planning on Fluency, Complexity and Accuracy in L2 Monologic Oral Production
- Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL
- Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback.
Their papers
- Does the writing of undergraduate ESL students develop after one year of study in an English-medium university? (2014) — 90 citations
- The Rasch wars: The emergence of Rasch measurement in language testing (2012) — 98 citations
- Rating scales for diagnostic assessment of writing: What should they look like and where should the criteria come from? (2011) — 178 citations
- Raising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback. (2010) — 479 citations
- The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. (2010) — 488 citations
- The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback (2009) — 274 citations
- Diagnostic Writing Assessment: The Development and Validation of a Rating Scale (2009) — 86 citations
- Diagnostic assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales (2009) — 209 citations
- The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students (2008) — 537 citations
- Evaluating rater responses to an online training program for L2 writing assessment (2007) — 121 citations
- Re-Training Writing Raters Online: How Does It Compare with Face-to-Face Training?. (2007) — 130 citations