Diagnostic assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales
By U. Knoch. 2009
209 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e196a192735407e753f724cc150c661aa63ad259
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Language and Linguistics
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- Functional adequacy in L2 writing: Towards a new rating scale (2017, background): “The importance of FA as an essential component of L2 proficiency has been observed by authors such as Pallotti (2009), Kuiken et al.”
- Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing (2010, unknown): “Some educators have reported that rater reliability is substantially higher when more detailed descriptors are used (Knoch, 2009).”
- Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods (2015, background): “…of research confirms the critical roles of rating criteria in performance assessment, supported by a key finding of the greater importance of welldeveloped rating criteria over raters’ experience in ensuring raters’ reliable scoring decisions (Barkaoui, 2010; Knoch, 2009; Xi & Mollaun, 2011).”