Rating scales for diagnostic assessment of writing: What should they look like and where should the criteria come from?

By U. Knoch. 2011

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d4dfdedb1c0741bcc1a4ddda6adc3d21e43818c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. F. Kuiken
2. I. Vedder
3. Judit Kormos
4. Anna Trebits

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. F. Kuiken
2. I. Vedder
3. N. Storch
4. Youjin Kim
5. N. Vyatkina

Citations in the corpus

• Functional adequacy in L2 writing: Towards a new rating scale (2017, background): “The studies discussed here demonstrate the necessity to develop a valid, reliable, and theory-based rating scale, in order to assess FA as a crucial dimension of L2 proficiency (Fulcher, 1987; McNamara, 2002; Knoch, 2011).”