Raising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback.

By J. Bitchener, U. Knoch. 2010

479 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51a4151a3632c2b03c462c26c91d696b4d27aefa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta‐Analysis (2015, background): “When the same experimental result was reported in multiple published studies, as in Bitchener and Knoch (2009, 2010a), only one was included in themeta-analysis.”
Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Insights, and Future Directions (2010, background): “Moreover, the reported accuracy gains proved to be very durable; Bitchener and Knoch (2010a), for example, showed that students who had received focused CF (only once) continued to outperform students whose errors had not been corrected over a 10-month period.”
The Potential Role(s) of Writing in Second Language Development. (2012, background): “Several studies claim that it is possible to provide feedback for acquisition; that is, they have demonstrated positive results for corrective feedback with longer-term measures (Bitchener & Knoch, 2010a, 2010b; Chandler, 2003; Sheen, 2007).”
Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy (2019, background): “The results of these more recent studies (e.g. Bitchener, 2008; Bitchener & Knoch, 2010a, 2010b; Ellis, Sheen, Murakami, & Takashima, 2008; Sheen, 2007, 2010; Sheen, Wright, & Moldawa, 2009; Shintani, Ellis, & Suzuki, 2014; Stefanou & Révész, 2015; Van Beuningen, de Jong, & Kuiken, 2012) provide…”
The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing (2018, methodology): “Previous studies, however, have used feedback on single errors (e.g., Bitchener, 2008; Bitchener & Knoch, 2008, 2009a, 2010b; Sheen, 2007, 2010a) or if on multiple errors, the feedback was provided on one writing task (Ellis et al., 2008; Truscott & Hsu, 2008; Van Beuningen et al., 2012).”