J. Bitchener

Language and Linguistics · 2005–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 26 researchers and is trusted by 58 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Language and Linguistics — 92 citations into it; #41 of 3,093 by trust here, #57 by citations
• Literature and Literary Theory — 77 citations into it; #25 of 2,496 by trust here, #41 by citations
• Education — 59 citations into it; #266 of 11,309 by trust here, #770 by citations
• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 33 citations into it; #704 of 8,223 by trust here, #1,570 by citations
• General Health Professions — 5 citations into it

Whom J. Bitchener trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. D. Ferris
2. Jean Chandler
3. Yuko Goto Butler
4. R. Ellis
5. John Truscott
6. Younghee Sheen
7. R. Lyster
8. ZhaoHong Han
9. Noriko Iwashita
10. Danielle Guénette

Who trusts J. Bitchener overall

1. D. Ferris
2. N. Storch
3. K. Karim
4. C. V. Beuningen
5. E. Kang
6. Hossein Nassaji
7. Icy Lee
8. Susan D. Benson
9. Younghee Sheen
10. R. Ellis

Papers from J. Bitchener's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Bitchener trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE?
2. The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners´ Acquisition of Articles.
3. The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing.
4. THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS KINDS OF ERROR FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE ACCURACY AND FLUENCY OF L2 STUDENT WRITING
5. Response To Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students
6. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing
7. Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?
8. The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?)
9. Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback.
10. Teaching ESL composition : purpose, process, and practice

Their papers

• Supervisors' on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: socialising students into the academic discourse community (2014) — 146 citations
• A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF (2012) — 186 citations
• Raising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback. (2010) — 479 citations
• The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. (2010) — 488 citations
• The Focus of Supervisor Written Feedback to Thesis/Dissertation Students (2010) — 124 citations
• The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback (2009) — 274 citations
• Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback. (2008) — 972 citations
• The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students (2008) — 537 citations
• Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section (2006) — 350 citations
• The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing. (2005) — 1,056 citations