Evaluating rater responses to an online training program for L2 writing assessment

By C. Elder, Gary Barkhuizen, U. Knoch, Janet von Randow. 2007

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Language and Linguistics, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27fcd63c690548d3de608024543c4e9b94446fa3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Larry Davis
2. U. Knoch
3. Lyn May
4. S. Youn
5. C. V. Beuningen
6. D. Ferris
7. Hossein Nassaji
8. Icy Lee

In Language and Linguistics

1. Larry Davis
2. U. Knoch
3. Lyn May
4. C. V. Beuningen
5. Hossein Nassaji
6. K. Karim
7. S. Youn
8. D. Ferris

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. U. Knoch
2. Larry Davis

Citations in the corpus

• Diagnostic assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales (2009, background): “All raters have several years of experience as DELNA raters and take part in regular training moderation sessions either face-to-face or online (Elder et al., 2007; Knoch et al., 2007).”
• The influence of training and experience on rater performance in scoring spoken language (2016, background): “…protocols are not always available, but typical rater-training procedures have been described in the literature for several smaller tests (e.g., Elder et al., 2007; Lim, 2011), and for some of the larger tests brief descriptions of actual or parallel training protocols are available (e.g.,…”