K. Meier

Education · 2001–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 14 papers; trusts 14 researchers and is trusted by 32 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom K. Meier trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Rajeev Dehejia
  2. Jeffrey A. Smith
  3. Marco Caliendo
  4. Clive W. J. Granger
  5. Petra E. Todd
  6. J. Conway
  7. George Farkas
  8. Sabine Kopeinig
  9. C. Lance
  10. L. O'toole

Who trusts K. Meier overall

  1. Morten Jakobsen
  2. Rhys Andrews
  3. Thomas Anning-Dorson
  4. L. O'toole
  5. Rusi Sun
  6. George A. Boyne
  7. R. Jensen
  8. T. Ashikali
  9. Nathan Favero
  10. N. V. van Loon

Papers from K. Meier's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers K. Meier trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Practical propensity score matching: a reply to Smith and Todd
  2. Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching (Social Science Research Network)
  3. Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance
  4. What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research
  5. Method Effects, Measurement Error, and Substantive Conclusions
  6. Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quadratic, and Interaction Effects
  7. On the validity of subjective measures of company performance
  8. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
  9. Generalizations about Using Value-Added Measures of Teacher Quality
  10. Public Service Performance: Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration

Their papers