Subjective Organizational Performance and Measurement Error: Common Source Bias and Spurious Relationships

409 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Diversity management for all? An empirical analysis of diversity management outcomes across groups (2015, methodology): “The analysis in this study runs the risk of common method bias (Podsakoff et al., 2003; Meier and O’Toole, 2013) since diversity management and inclusiveness of the organizational culture were measured, together with the dependent variables affective commitment and OCB, in a single questionnaire bas”
Customer involvement capability and service firm performance: The mediating role of innovation (2017, positive): “Services studies (e.g., Anning-Dorson, 2017b; Bello et al., 2016; Karpen, Bove, Lukas, & Zyphur, 2015; Meier & O'Toole, 2013) have used subjective measures.”
Common Method Bias in Public Management Studies (2015, methodology): “7 For example, Meier and O'Toole (2013a) provide such evidence on measures of public organization performance.”
Clarifying the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and In-Role and Extra-Role Behaviors: The Relative Contributions of Person-Job and Person-Organization Fit (2017, methodology): “…and that management practices show similar effects using both subjective and register performance data, but others view objective data as “the golden standard” (Andrews, Boyne, & Walker, 2011; Bommer, Johnson, Rich, Podsakoff, & Mackenzie, 1995; C. C. Hoffman et al., 1991; Meier & O’Toole, 2013).”