I Think (I Am Doing Well), Therefore I Am: Assessing the Validity of Administrators' Self-Assessments of Performance

By K. Meier, L. O'toole. 2013

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57cd24701b6c0f5855ed72e8c6d9990cb30ee273

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Nathan Favero
2. Justin B. Bullock
3. R. Jensen
4. Morten Jakobsen

In Public Administration

1. R. Jensen
2. Morten Jakobsen
3. Nathan Favero
4. Justin B. Bullock
5. Joris van der Voet
6. B. Steijn
7. A. Maxwell
8. P. Riley

Citations in the corpus

• How (Not) to Solve the Problem: An Evaluation of Scholarly Responses to Common Source Bias (2015, background): “Existing research on both public and private managers has shown that perceptions of the performance of one’s own organization appear to exhibit rather large errors (see Meier and O’Toole 2013a).”
• Common Method Bias in Public Management Studies (2015, methodology): “If we turn to the public management literature, Meier and O’Toole (2013a; 2013b) have conducted some of the most comprehensive empirical investigations of common method bias.”